Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hodges Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$365kHuman Services$6kEducation$4kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$3kCrime & Legal$750Food & Nutrition$400
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWINGPALS INC$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $3k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Hodges Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Hodges Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$381k · 12 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$381k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+89%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SWINGPALS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $347k · revenue +384% · 39% of their budget
  • SI
    STREETSQUASH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • SQUASHBUSTERS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • TM
    THE MENS COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $250
  • BO
    BBBS OF THE TRIANGLE
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebound Alternatives for Youth

To provide strength-based support to durham schools to end the detrimental impact of out of school suspensions. we provide alternative programming that focuses on the inherent strengths and potential of each student to help them…

—
2
Durham Dreams Youth Mentorship Foundation

To improve outcomes for students in the Durham community by providing programs focused on academic success, social-emotional well being, and leadership.

—
3
Tresports Association

To enrich and impact the lives of economically disadvantaged youth of NC by filling the educational gaps, emotional and lack of parental involvement through the utilization of sports.

Youth Development
4
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
5
Student U

Our mission is to empower and equip first-generation college students in durham public schools, their families, and educators to become the leaders that will transform our city.

Education
6
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
7
Junior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc

Junior achievement is the world's largest organization dedicated to educating private and public school students in grades k-12 about entrepreneurship, workforce readiness, and financial literacy, through experiential, hands-on programs.

International
8
Kids Interdisciplinary Services Inc

To provide hope and healing for children who have been abused

Health
9
Durham County Teen Court & Restitution

To hold juvenile and youthful offenders accountable for criminal and delinquent behaviorand to provide constructive opportunities for community service and victim restitution;and toempower our youth, enhance their knowledge of the legal…

—
10
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
11
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
12
Collegespring Inc

In partnership with educators, CollegeSpring helps students impacted by poverty demonstrate their full potential on college and career readiness assessments that unlock better opportunities after high school. Our vision is that every…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Squashbusters Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Family Violence Prevention Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SWINGPALS INC: $347,250 · Youth DevelopmentSWINGPALS INC+1 more: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTREETSQUASH INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNEAL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $4,250 · OtherHEARTS CLUB: $3,000 · OtherPartners for Youth Opportunity: $600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $400 · OtherURBAN MINISTRIES: $400 · Other+3 more: $600 · OtherThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $5,712 · Human ServicesFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationBOOK HARVEST: $400 · EducationORANGE COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $750 · HealthHOPE REINS: $100 · Health
Youth Development$353,250Recreation & Sports$10,000Other$9,750Human Services$5,712Education$2,900Health$850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSWINGPALS INC: $347,250 over 9y, 39% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $5,712 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPartners for Youth Opportunity: $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOOK HARVEST: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SWINGPALS INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Partners for Youth Opportunity ↗
  • Who funds BOOK HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds HOPE REINS ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hodges Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hodges Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hodges Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hodges Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hodges Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph