Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hoagland Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$73kYouth Development$14kEducation$12kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
7
States reached
$294k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$8,000
LEWIS & CLARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$1,000
ORCAS CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$500
PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE$200
OASIS WOMEN'S CENTER$200
Individual grant recipient$100
ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100
GREAT RIVERS LAND TRUST$100
JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL$100
ILLINOIS SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION$100
DUCKS UNLIMITED$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $200 → 11%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%PEDAL FOR THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%OASIS WOMEN'S CENTER: $400 → 12%OASIS WOMENS CENTER: $200 → 12%OASIS WOMEN'S CENTER: $200 → 12%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $200 → 12%OASIS WOMENS CENTER: $200 → 12%OASIS WOMENS CENTER: $200 → 12%OASIS WOMENS CENTER: $200 → 12%OASIS WOMEN'S CENTER: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
PA
CA
MO
KS
AR
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$113k · 24 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$113k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +50%
  • OC
    ORCAS CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +100%
  • OO
    ORCAS OPEN ARTS
    5× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TS
    THE SEADOC SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • SS
    SENIOR SERVICES PLUS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
10
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Crisis Food Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr22%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr15%81%20–35yr14%8%35–55yr22%8%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,335

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $53,200 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCHEMMANUEL EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $19,000 · OtherEMMANUEL EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEWIS & CLARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $6,000 · OtherLEWIS & CLARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE+23 more — $14,310 · Other+23 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC — $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $4,000 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $1,300 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 · EducationSAN DOMENICO SCHOOL — $200 · EducationORCAS CENTER — $4,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $400 · Arts & CultureOASIS WOMENS CENTER — $1,600 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE CAUSE — $1,400 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS FOOD CENTER INC — $200 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $200 · Human ServicesORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,400 · PhilanthropyThe Borgen Project — $600 · International
Other$101,510Youth Development$13,000Education$6,000Arts & Culture$4,400Human Services$4,400Philanthropy$1,400International$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC — $13,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetORCAS CENTER — $4,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS OPEN ARTS — $2,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOASIS WOMENS CENTER — $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE — $1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $1,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Borgen Project — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $460 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRIDE INCORPORATED — $400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC
  • Who funds ORCAS CENTER
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds ORCAS OPEN ARTS
  • Who funds OASIS WOMENS CENTER
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES PLUS INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds The Borgen Project
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PRIDE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds CRISIS FOOD CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
  • Who funds ILLINOIS SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SAN DOMENICO SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater St Louis IncMO15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Orcas Bay Foundation · Sos Foundation · Www Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hoagland Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hoagland Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hoagland Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph