Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Higley Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$630k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.8MCommunity Improvement$950kHealth$640kPublic Benefit$325kReligion$254kAnimals$209kFood & Nutrition$201kRecreation & Sports$200kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $171k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $183k
  • $250k+1 grant · $255k
$16,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATIO$255,000
BROAD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURC$107,500
AUNT MARY'S HOUSE$75,000
IMPACT PROJECT$45,000
NORTHEAST CLASSIC CAR MUSEUM$30,000
CHENANGO COUNTY BLUES SOCIETY$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CNY$20,000
PROMOTE OXFORD NOW$16,700
CHENANGO VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO ASSN$15,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$12,000
COLORSCAPE$12,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,600
THE BANDERA FAMILY COMMUNITY ALLIAN$5,000
CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AUNT MARY'S HOUSE: $75k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 20 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+6%

Still filing today

35%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $928k · revenue +14% · 47% of their budget
  • NC
    Northeast Classic Car Museum Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $780k · revenue +18% · 36% of their budget
  • CC
    CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $77k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • TO
    TOWN OF OXFORD
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $105k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern York County Historical & Preservation Society
—
2
Sharon Historical Society-Sharon Springs New York Inc

The mission of the Sharon Historical Society is to make all people aware of our history by linking the past with the present in order to inform them of our future. The Sharon Historical Society exists to inspire people's understanding that…

Arts & Culture
3
Central New York Adult Homes Inc

Provides residential adult care for facility occupants who are unable to live independently.

—
4
Cheektowaga Historical Assn Inc

To operate as a tax free entity to enlighten the public of the history of the beginning of the town and it is all volunteer based work

Arts & Culture
5
Norwalk Historical Society Inc

To maintain the research, preservation and promotion of norwalk history.

Arts & Culture
6
Chenango Housing Improvement Prgm Inc

The organization's mission is to create, provide, and maintain housing for elderly and low income families.

—
7
Chautauqua County Land Bank Corporation

To reverse the trend of further deterioration of the County of Chautauqua's housing and commercial stock; control and modestly improve promising properties so that reputable buyers can be attracted.

Housing & Shelter
8
Newburgh Preservation Association Inc

The newburgh preservation association rebuilds, preserves, and promotes the architectural heritage and historic viewsheds of newburgh, new york.

—
9
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Britain

The corporation is engaged in encouraging the cooperative efforts of neighborhood representatives, government and participating lending institutions in a combined effort to stem the decline and deterioration of the housing within the city…

Housing & Shelter
10
The John Green Preservation Coalition Inc

Rehabilitation of the historic john green house

Arts & Culture
11
Newcomb Historical Museum

The organization was formed to safeguard and share existing and future collections related to the social, cultural, and economic history of the high peaks adirondack region in and around the township of newcomb in essex county, new york.

Arts & Culture
12
Housing Assistance Program of Essex County Inc

To administer section 8 housing in clinton and essex counties, ny while also assisting low income resident complete home purchases and home renovations to maintain safe and adequate housing.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Improve Norwich Now Inc; the most unlike its peers is Toys for Tots Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATI: $500,000 · OtherCHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIFRIENDS OF THE MUSEUM DISTRICT: $383,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MUSEUM DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $312,761 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE PLACE: $211,093 · OtherTHE PLACEBROAD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURC: $207,500 · OtherBROAD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCTOWN OF OXFORD: $200,000 · OtherTOWN OF OXFORDCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CNY: $113,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC: $105,000 · OtherALL ANIMALS MATTER: $103,870 · OtherSPCA: $99,869 · Other+18 more: $361,426 · Other+18 moreNortheast Classic Car Museum Inc: $780,000 · Arts & CultureNortheast Classic Car Museum …THE IMPACT PROJECT: $472,000 · Arts & CultureTHE IMPACT PROJECTCHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $77,000 · Arts & CultureCHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SO…CHENANGO COUNTY BLUES ASSOCIATION: $55,000 · Arts & CultureNORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATION INC: $927,850 · Community ImprovementNORWICH BUILDING TO…IMPROVE NORWICH NOW INC: $324,822 · Public BenefitAUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesPROMOTE OXFORD NOW INC: $16,700 · PhilanthropyMORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Education
Other$2,598,019Arts & Culture$1,384,000Community Improvement$927,850Public Benefit$324,822Human Services$75,000Philanthropy$16,700Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATION INC: $927,850 over 3y, 47% of budgetNortheast Classic Car Museum Inc: $780,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetTHE IMPACT PROJECT: $472,000 over 5y, 55% of budgetIMPROVE NORWICH NOW INC: $324,822 over 2y, 44% of budgetHOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC: $105,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $77,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetAUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY BLUES ASSOCIATION: $55,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetTOYS FOR TOTS INC: $21,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetNYSARC INC BROOME-CHENANGO- TIOGA COUNTIES CHAPTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROMOTE OXFORD NOW INC: $16,700 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetMORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORWICH BUILDING TOMORROW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northeast Classic Car Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE IMPACT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds IMPROVE NORWICH NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CHENANGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AUNT MARY'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY BLUES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TOYS FOR TOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NYSARC INC BROOME-CHENANGO- TIOGA COUNTIES CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds PROMOTE OXFORD NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds MORRISVILLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito FoundationNY28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Frederick B and Ramona E Mirabito Foundation · The Roger W Follett Foundation Inc Co Lee Emerson and Palmer LLP · The Greater Norwich Foundation · The R C Smith Foundation Inc · The Phyllis a and Daryl R Forsythe Foundation · Thomas &Esther Flanagan Charitable Trust · Otis a Thompson Foundation Inc · Raymond Foundation · The Nycm Foundation · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Higley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Higley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Higley Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Higley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Higley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph