Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Higgins Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$446k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.4MHealth$830kEducation$586kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kCivil Rights$85kHuman Services$47kAnimals$40kPublic Benefit$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
WILD SALMON CENTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CIRCLE OF CARE$25,000
FORTERRA NW$25,000
COLLEGE IS REAL$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY$25,000
SWEDISH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
RAINER SCHOLARS$10,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$10,000
REPRESENT US$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROOM ONE: $10k → 17%ROOM ONE: $5k → 17%ROOM ONE: $5k → 17%ROOM ONE: $5k → 17%SOULUMINATION: $5k → 9%SOULUMINATION: $5k → 9%SOULUMINATION: $5k → 9%SOULUMINATION: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 9%SOULIMINATION: $1k → 9%SOULIMINATION: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 28 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$3.1M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+6%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $465k · revenue +118%
  • RS
    RAINIER SCHOLARS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $385k · revenue +359%
  • WILD SALMON CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $270k · revenue +274%

Funded once

  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • EA
    ETHICAL APPAREL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • S
    SOULIMINATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
2
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
3
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
4
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
5
Whatcom Land Trust

The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.

Environment
6
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
9
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
12
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center; the most unlike its peers is College Access Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CIRCLE OF CARE: $165,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CIRCLE OF CAREUW MEDICINE: $145,000 · OtherUW MEDICINESEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALSWEDISH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherSWEDISH HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $100,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $80,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CEN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $65,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Washington: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $161,000 · Other+10 moreTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $465,000 · AnimalsTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIET…WILD SALMON CENTER: $270,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTERLONG LIVE THE KINGS: $45,000 · AnimalsLONG LIVE THE KINGSFORTERRA NW: $425,000 · EnvironmentFORTERRA NWENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $90,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENS…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $35,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC…Stewardship Partners: $31,000 · EnvironmentStewardship PartnersRAINIER SCHOLARS: $385,000 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARSCollege is Real Inc: $190,000 · EducationCollege is Real IncAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $125,000 · Human ServicesRoom One: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOULUMINATION: $22,000 · Human ServicesSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthRepresentUs: $40,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,031,000Animals$780,000Environment$581,000Education$575,000Human Services$172,000Health$75,000Public Benefit$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $465,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFORTERRA NW: $425,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $385,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $270,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCollege is Real Inc: $190,000 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Washington: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLONG LIVE THE KINGS: $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRepresentUs: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $35,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetStewardship Partners: $31,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetRoom One: $25,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOULUMINATION: $22,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetMETHOW CONSERVANCY: $16,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMETHOW HOUSING TRUST: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFARESTART: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Access Now: $10,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds College is Real Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Washington ↗
  • Who funds LONG LIVE THE KINGS ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds Stewardship Partners ↗
  • Who funds Room One ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds SOULUMINATION ↗
  • Who funds METHOW CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds METHOW HOUSING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds College Access Now ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Kaleidoscope Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Higgins Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Higgins Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Higgins Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph