Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hickey Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$908k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$12MHealth$8.5MPhilanthropy$2.7MYouth Development$2.4MHuman Services$2.0MFood & Nutrition$1.2MCrime & Legal$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$547kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+12 grants · $5.3M
$200,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$151M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$908,309
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$600,000
NPH-USA$575,000
Children's Global Health Fund$550,000
PROJECT PEANUT BUTTER$500,415
NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS$450,000
ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$325,000
Shared Hope International$300,000
Middle East Children's Institute$280,000
SONS OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE$274,575
CULTURE REFRAMED$250,000
Regents of the University of Califo$250,000
Arizona Legal Women And Youth Servi$215,000
OCJ Kids$200,000
MEDS FOOD FOR KIDS$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Children's Global Health Fund: $550k → 9%Street Grace: $50k → 9%Shared Hope International: $300k → 9%Children's Global Health Fund: $550k → 9%Shared Hope International: $240k → 9%Children's Global Health Fund: $275k → 9%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $75k → 15%Children's Global Health Fund: $275k → 9%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $81k → 15%Children's Global Health Fund: $275k → 9%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $81k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $75k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $12k → 15%Catholic Charities Community Servic: $86k → 11%Catholic Charities Community Servic: $85k → 11%Arizona Anti-Trafficking Network: $10k → 11%Catholic Charities Community Servic: $85k → 11%Arizona Anti-Trafficking Network: $10k → 11%Circle the City: $75k → 11%OCJ Kids: $250k → 11%OCJ Kids: $249k → 11%OCJ Kids: $200k → 11%OCJ Kids: $200k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
CA
MO
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of The Hickey Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Hickey Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 30% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 32 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
19

Total granted

$28M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+76%

Still filing today

63%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $431k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +10%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +24%
  • CG
    CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +224% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • PP
    Phoenix Police Dept FBO HEAT Unit
    one grant, 2022 · $249k
  • CO
    CITY OF PHOENIX
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • UO
    University of AZ Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $127k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
2
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
3
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
6
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
7
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
8
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
11
Philadelphia Children's Alliance

Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…

Crime & Legal
12
American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona

To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Orphans D/B/a Nph-Usa; the most unlike its peers is Womens Justice Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $4,610,383 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONSONS OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE: $1,775,356 · OtherSONS OF DIVINE PROVIDENCEMEDS FOOD FOR KIDS: $1,000,000 · OtherMEDS FOOD FOR KIDSArizona Legal Women And Youth Servi: $860,000 · OtherArizona Legal Women And Youth ServiRegents of the University of Califo: $851,450 · OtherRegents of the University of Califo+27 more: $3,011,383 · Other+27 morePROJECT PEANUT BUTTER: $2,684,925 · InternationalPROJECT PEANUT BUTTERFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $2,512,628 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NP…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $2,500,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPSMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $800,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUT…POLARIS PROJECT: $300,000 · International+1 more: $50,000 · InternationalCHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $1,925,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS GLOB…OCJ KIDS: $899,250 · Human ServicesOCJ KIDSSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $539,615 · Human ServicesSHARED HOPE IN…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $323,760 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR…CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $256,114 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARI…+4 more: $245,000 · Human Services+4 moreARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,737,403 · PhilanthropyARIZONA C…NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $1,800,000 · HealthMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $300,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $200,000 · HealthCULTURE REFRAMED INC: $1,250,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX: $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentUCLA FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $96,683 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationVISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC: $30,000 · Education
Other$12,108,572International$8,847,553Human Services$4,188,739Philanthropy$2,737,403Health$2,300,000Youth Development$1,650,000Education$326,683

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,737,403 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT PEANUT BUTTER: $2,684,925 over 5y, 26% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $2,512,628 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $2,500,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $1,925,000 over 5y, 45% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $1,800,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCULTURE REFRAMED INC: $1,250,000 over 5y, 51% of budgetOCJ KIDS: $899,250 over 4y, 32% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $800,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $539,615 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetVALLEY BLOOM: $325,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $323,760 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX: $300,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $300,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $256,114 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetANGELS ON PATROL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $96,683 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStarfish Partnerships Corporation: $80,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD: $60,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetEPIK PROJECT: $55,889 over 1y, 17% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetStreet Grace Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSONORAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $37,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA: $25,280 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA: $24,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICKING NETWORK: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT PEANUT BUTTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTURE REFRAMED INC ↗
  • Who funds OCJ KIDS ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY BLOOM ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS ON PATROL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Starfish Partnerships Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE THE CITY ↗
  • Who funds AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ35.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Ibis Foundation of Arizona co Casey LeSueur Getz CPAs PLLC · Burton Family Foundation · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · American Express Foundation · Gannett Foundation Inc · The Bob & Renee Parsons Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hickey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hickey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hickey Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hickey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hickey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph