Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Herum Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$59kReligion$53kHuman Services$11kInternational$10kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$750
Median grant
3
States reached
$710k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH$17,750
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$2,000
HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY$850
LDA CENTER FOR DISCORD MINISTRY$750
HAGGIN MUSEUM$750
THE SENDING PLACE$600
Individual grant recipient$580
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$400
PIXIE WOODS INC$280
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $1k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $1k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $850 → 12%Hospice of San Joaquin: $750 → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $300 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$177k · 16 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$177k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-11%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +628%
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +38%
  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • DM
    DIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -11%
  • SF
    STALC FAMILY PROMISE ST ANDREWS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
2
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
3
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
4
Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc

Catholic medical mission board (cmmb) is an international, faith-based nonprofit that believes in healthier lives worldwide. we work in partnerships globally to deliver locally sustainable, quality health solutions, (continued on schedule…

International
5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Mission Hospice & Home Care Inc

Delivering compassionate support and exceptional care in the home for individuals and communities, guiding them with choice and dignity to navigate significant care decisions.

Human Services
7
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
8
Clinica Sierra Vista

The mission of clinica sierra vista is to provide quality health care to the underserved populations of kern and fresno counties. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
9
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
10
Franciscan Care Services Inc

The mission of franciscan care services, inc. is to live and to promote the healing mission of jesus christ by providing quality health care and health related inpatient, outpatient, home health and physician services to anyone in…

Health
11
Catholic Residential Services Inc Dba Benedictine Living Communities of Wi

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
12
Saint Agnes Medical Foundation

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical foundation is a member of saint agnes medical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gospel Center Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pixie Woods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $58,725 · OtherST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCHMARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $5,000 · OtherMARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S SHELTERTHE HAGGIN MUSEUM: $4,300 · OtherLDA CENTER FOR DISCORD MINISTRY: $4,000 · OtherCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL: $3,750 · OtherChildren's Home of Stockton Inc: $3,500 · Other+14 more: $12,275 · Other+14 moreST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $59,280 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICESLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $12,000 · InternationalHospice of San Joaquin: $7,350 · Human ServicesBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $6,500 · ReligionGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterDIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC: $1,050 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $400 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $350 · HealthPIXIE WOODS INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$91,550Food & Nutrition$59,280International$12,000Human Services$7,350Religion$6,500Housing & Shelter$4,500Health$1,800Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $59,280 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin: $7,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Home of Stockton Inc: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC: $1,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIXIE WOODS INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN DIACONAL ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of San Joaquin ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Home of Stockton Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PIXIE WOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN DIACONAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cortopassi Family FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · Crete Family Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The 54 Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Herum Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herum Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Herum’s filings →

More from the funding graph