Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Herum Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Food & Nutrition$59kReligion$53kHuman Services$11kInternational$10kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$641k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S DINING ROOM$5,000
ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,000
HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY$300
PIXIE WOODS INC$240
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $2k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $1k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $1k → 12%Hospice of San Joaquin: $750 → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $300 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$152k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$152k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-11%

Still filing today

47%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +628%
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • DM
    DIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -11%
  • SF
    STALC FAMILY PROMISE ST ANDREWS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
2
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
3
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
4
Mission Hospice & Home Care Inc

Delivering compassionate support and exceptional care in the home for individuals and communities, guiding them with choice and dignity to navigate significant care decisions.

Human Services
5
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
6
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
7
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
8
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
10
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
11
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
12
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gospel Center Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pixie Woods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH — $40,975 · OtherST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCHMARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S SHELTER — $5,000 · OtherMARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S SHELTERCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL — $3,750 · OtherTHE HAGGIN MUSEUM — $3,550 · OtherChildren's Home of Stockton Inc — $3,500 · OtherLDA CENTER FOR DISCORD MINISTRY — $3,250 · OtherWOMEN'S CENTER — $2,500 · Other+13 more — $8,595 · Other+13 moreST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES — $59,280 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICESLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $10,000 · InternationalHospice of San Joaquin — $6,500 · Human ServicesBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $6,500 · ReligionGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC — $4,500 · Housing & ShelterDIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC — $1,050 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $350 · HealthPIXIE WOODS INC — $720 · Philanthropy
Other$71,120Food & Nutrition$59,280International$10,000Human Services$6,500Religion$6,500Housing & Shelter$4,500Health$1,400Philanthropy$720

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES — $59,280 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin — $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Home of Stockton Inc — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIXIE WOODS INC — $720 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN DIACONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
  • Who funds Hospice of San Joaquin
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
  • Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds Children's Home of Stockton Inc
  • Who funds DIRECTIONS MEDICAL CLINIC
  • Who funds PIXIE WOODS INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN DIACONAL ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cortopassi Family FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · Crete Family Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · The 54 Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Herum Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph