Skip to content
The Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$188kHealth$143kReligion$101kHuman Services$95kPhilanthropy$60kCivil Rights$33kHousing & Shelter$26kEnvironment$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION-DR MARK L MILLER MEMORIAL ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP$10,000
MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION$10,000
MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
INDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
CLINICA FAMILY HEALTH AND WELLNESS$4,000
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL$4,000
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$4,000
BOULDER VALLEY HEALTH CENTER$3,000
BIG OAK RANCH INC$3,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA$3,000
THERE WITH CARE$3,000
COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK$2,500
THE WELLHOUSE$2,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUALITY CENTER$2,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HARBOR SPRINGS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $5k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $4k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $3k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $3k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $3k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $3k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $3k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH INC: $2k → 13%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $1k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $1k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $1k → 12%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $1k → 12%UNLESS U: $2k → 16%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $1k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $5k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $3k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $2k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $2k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $2k → 12%MOUNTAIN BROOK FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%THERE WITH CARE: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $500 → 12%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $500 → 12%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK: $3k → 16%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $5k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $3k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $2k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $2k → 16%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $1k → 16%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $1k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $1k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $1k → 16%YWCA CENTRAL ALABAMA: $1k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $1k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $1k → 16%FIRST LIGHT INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$606k · 38 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
13

Total granted

$606k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+45%

Still filing today

61%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MN
    MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +57%
  • MN
    MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN
    4× · 2018–2021 · $44k · revenue +10%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • PO
    PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -100%
  • LH
    LINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue -58%
  • DS
    DAWSON SCHOOL - DAWSON FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Columbia Basin Health Association

To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.

Health
4
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
6
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
7
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
8
Boulder Community Health

To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.

Health
9
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
10
Boulder Valley Women's Health Center Inc

Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.

—
11
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
12
The Foundation of Firsthealth Inc

Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Aging Services Foundation of Boulder County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
24/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $81,500 · OtherINDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $47,000 · OtherBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGEHIGHLANDS SCHOOL CAMPAIGN: $33,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS SCHOOL CAMPAIGNAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION-DR MARK L MILLER MEMORIAL ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP: $27,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION-DR MARK L MILLER MEMORIAL END…BOULDER CENTER FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING AT DAWSON: $20,000 · OtherBOULDER CENTER FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING AT DAWSONMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $13,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HARBOR SPRINGS: $12,500 · OtherHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherDAWSON SCHOOL: $12,000 · OtherLegal Aid Foundation of Colorado: $13,000 · OtherLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $13,000 · Other+21 more: $75,000 · Other+21 moreMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $45,000 · HealthMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGA…MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $44,000 · HealthMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGA…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $36,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION O…Christ Health Center Inc: $17,000 · HealthChrist Health Center IncMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $6,000 · Health+2 more: $3,500 · HealthBIG OAK RANCH INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INCTHERE WITH CARE: $21,500 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARECOMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FURNITU…FIRST LIGHT INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesFIRST LIGHT INCAGING SERVICES FOUNDATION OF BOULDER COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesAGING SERVICES FO…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $8,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRI…SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+3 more: $6,000 · Human Services+3 moreLINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC: $19,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $8,000 · EducationBetter Ballot Georgia Inc: $1,000 · EducationPROTECTION OF RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterDOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Philanthropy
Other$359,000Health$151,500Human Services$105,000Education$28,000Public Benefit$25,000Housing & Shelter$16,000Philanthropy$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $47,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $44,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $36,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECTION OF RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $21,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC: $19,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetChrist Health Center Inc: $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLegal Aid Foundation of Colorado: $13,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST LIGHT INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAGING SERVICES FOUNDATION OF BOULDER COUNTY: $10,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER COMMUNITY BROADCAST ASSOC INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S WILDERNESS INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERA BIRMINGHAM INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNLESS U INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHARVEST OF HOPE PANTRY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFocus Reentry: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP WINNATASKA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBetter Ballot Georgia Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CENTER FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING AT DAWSON ↗
  • Who funds LINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Colorado ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds AGING SERVICES FOUNDATION OF BOULDER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY BROADCAST ASSOC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Altecstyslinger Found…Alabama Power Foundat…Robert R Meyer Founda…Protective Life Found…The Daniel Foundation…Dunn-French FoundationSusan Mott Webb Chari…Hill Crest Foundation…Orlean & Ralph W Bees…Community Foundation …Campbell Estelle S Ch…
The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL32.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Dunn-French Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Community Foundation Boulder County · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home