· Private foundation
The Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of THE HERBERT AND PEGGY STOCKHAM FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION-DR MARK L MILLER MEMORIAL ENDOWED SCHOLARSHIP | $10,000 |
| MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE | $4,000 |
| CLINICA FAMILY HEALTH AND WELLNESS | $4,000 |
| HIGHLANDS SCHOOL | $4,000 |
| BOULDER VALLEY HEALTH CENTER | $3,000 |
| BIG OAK RANCH INC | $3,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA | $3,000 |
| THERE WITH CARE | $3,000 |
| COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK | $2,500 |
| CHRIST HEALTH CENTER | $2,000 |
| LEGAL AID FOUNDATION OF COLORADO | $2,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HARBOR SPRINGS | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MNMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN4× · 2018–2021 · $44k · revenue +4%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +70%
- BOBIG OAK RANCH INC8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- POPROTECTION OF RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -100%
- LHLINLY HEFLIN UNIT INCone grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue -58%
- DSDAWSON SCHOOL - DAWSON FUNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.
To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.
Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alabama and the most unlike its peers is Aging Services Foundation of Boulder County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds BOULDER CENTER FOR INTERACTIVE LEARNING AT DAWSON ↗
- Who funds LINLY HEFLIN UNIT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FURNITURE BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Christ Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Colorado ↗
- Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds AGING SERVICES FOUNDATION OF BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Dunn-French Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Community Foundation Boulder County · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Herbert and Peggy Stockham Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.