Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Helen Schlaffer Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$357k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$513kEnvironment$432kAnimals$391kHealth$280kReligion$270kHuman Services$160kEducation$92kArts & Culture$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $264k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$50,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$24,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$23,000
WARNER LIBRARY$22,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$20,000
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS (IMF)$20,000
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC$20,000
CARE$15,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER$15,000
VOICE OF TRIUMPH MINISTRIES INC$15,000
WATERAID AMERICA INC$10,000
CAMFED USA FOUNDATION$10,000
MARBLE COLLEGIATE CHURCH$10,000
WORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Camfed U S A Foundation: $15k → 10%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS (IMF): $20k → 14%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $20k → 6%THE SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 14%Wateraid America Inc: $15k → 17%World Wildlife Fund Inc: $80k → 14%Voice of Triumph Ministries Inc: $25k → 7%St Jude Childrens Research Hospital Inc: $20k → 17%CARE: $35k → 13%Worldwide Fistula Fund Inc: $15k → 14%SALVATION ARMY & ITS COMPONENTS: $20k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US: $23k → 8%North Shore Animal League America Inc: $20k → 6%THE SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $73k → 14%Voice of Triumph Ministries Inc: $15k → 7%AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOC CHAR INC: $20k → 17%CARE: $15k → 13%SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $20k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US: $20k → 8%North Shore Animal League America Inc: $20k → 6%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER: $25k → 9%THE SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 14%World Wildlife Fund Inc: $55k → 14%VOICE OF TRIUMPH MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 7%AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOC CHAR INC: $20k → 17%CARE: $15k → 13%Salvation Army National Corp: $20k → 9%North Shore Animal League America Inc: $20k → 6%Humane Society Of Westchester Inc: $15k → 9%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50k → 14%VOICE OF TRIUMPH MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 7%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20k → 17%Salvation Army National Corp: $20k → 9%North Shore Animal League America Inc: $20k → 6%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20k → 17%Salvation Army National Corp: $20k → 9%World Wildlife Fund Inc: $43k → 14%St Jude Childrens Research Hospital Inc: $20k → 17%World Wildlife Fund Inc: $40k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $40k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $23k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $24k → 14%WARNER LIBRARY: $22k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $22k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $20k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
IN
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 32 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
9

Total granted

$2.1M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+34%

Still filing today

69%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $430k · revenue +43%
  • NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $160k · revenue +15%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $125k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY & ITS COMPONENTS
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IP
    IRVINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • NE
    NATIONAL EDUCATION ALLIANCE FOR BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
8
Veterinarians Without Borders Usa

Our mission is to strengthen animal health and welfare to build more resilient communities. we do this by enhancing veterinary care, bolstering community disaster response and recovery, championing sustainable livelihoods, and improving…

International
9
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
12
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WARNER LIBRARY: $92,000 · OtherWARNER LIBRARYVoice of Triumph Ministries Inc: $85,000 · OtherVoice of Triumph Ministries IncSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $80,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPMINISTER ELDERS AND DEACONS OF THE REFORMED PROTESTANT DUTCH CHURCH O: $70,000 · OtherMINISTER ELDERS AND DEACONS OF TH…THE SALVATION ARMY: $60,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCHURCH OF THE COVENANT: $60,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE COVENANTCooperative For Assistance And Relief Ev: $50,000 · OtherCooperative For Assistance And Re…VOICE OF TRIUMPH MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $45,000 · OtherVOICE OF TRIUMPH MINISTRIES INCOR…American Society For The Prevention Of C: $24,000 · Other+10 more: $84,750 · Other+10 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES…WATERAID AMERICA INC: $85,000 · InternationalWATERAID AMERICA INCCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $85,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATIONCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $80,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTAN…HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $47,000 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATI…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $20,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $17,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $17,000 · International+3 more: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $430,405 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND I…+1 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $160,000 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL …HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $95,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF W…Humane World for Animals Inc: $87,000 · AnimalsHumane World for An…+4 more: $43,000 · Animals+4 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 · HealthST JUDE C…WORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND: $85,000 · HealthWORLDWIDE…NAMI National: $7,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $49,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $40,000 · Religion
Other$650,750International$486,000Environment$432,405Animals$385,000Health$187,000Arts & Culture$49,000Religion$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $430,405 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $87,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND: $85,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $49,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $47,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $14,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EDUCATION ALLIANCE FOR BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE RIDE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATERAID AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS UNLIMITED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds WILD TOMORROW FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EDUCATION ALLIANCE FOR BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Helen Schlaffer Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Helen Schlaffer Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Helen Schlaffer Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Helen Schlaffer Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen Schlaffer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph