Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Heimsoth Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$41kHealth$18kReligion$16kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kInternational$2kEnvironment$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$154k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER FOR MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH FUND$6,978
LUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES$2,000
LUTHERAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMAING ARTS$1,025
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 15 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
31

Total granted

$64k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+13%

Still filing today

47%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +10%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IL
    Immanuel Lutheran Church General Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CF
    Carver Family Center Macular Degeneratio
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IL
    IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
7
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
12
Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center Inc

Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Committee for Refugees and Immigrants Inc; the most unlike its peers is Claude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $25,197 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER FOR MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH FUND: $6,978 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER FOR MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH FUNDLUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES: $6,500 · OtherLUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIESImmanuel Lutheran Church General Fund: $5,000 · OtherImmanuel Lutheran Church General FundCarver Family Center Macular Degeneratio: $5,000 · OtherCarver Family Center Macular DegeneratioAMERICAN RED CROSS - CENTRAL IOWA CHAPTER: $2,500 · Other+29 more: $11,506 · Other+29 moreSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF…+1 more: $200 · EducationMID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $4,611 · Community ImprovementST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $200 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 · HealthUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,700 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $100 · InternationalNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,700 · EnvironmentHOPE MINISTRIES: $500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesGreater Poweshiek Community Foundation: $440 · PhilanthropyClaude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation: $200 · Philanthropy
Other$62,681Education$15,200Community Improvement$4,611Health$2,400International$2,100Environment$1,700Human Services$1,000Philanthropy$640

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $4,611 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $469 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Poweshiek Community Foundation: $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClaude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLAKE SCHOOL: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA PBS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Poweshiek Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds Claude W & Dolly Ahrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE BLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Heimsoth Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Heimsoth Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heimsoth Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph