Skip to content
The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc

To provide assistance to programs for older adults in the new york area.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$17M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$127MHuman Services$67kPhilanthropy$55kInternational$35kArts & Culture$28kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $17M
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED AT RIVERDALE$16,790,703
Children of Armenia Fund$15,000
Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration$15,000
The New York Academy of Medicine$15,000
New York Presbyterian Fund$10,000
Northeast Business Group on Health$8,000
Boomer Esiason Foundation$7,500
United Hebrew of New Rochelle$5,010
Gurwin Jewish Healthcare$5,000
Gurwin Jewish Healthcare F$5,000
UGC Foundation$5,000
Parker Jewish Institute Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AJAS: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127M · 7 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$127M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $42k · revenue +59%
  • CO
    CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF
    3× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +40%
  • YA
    YOUNG AUDIENCES INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +3%
  • SF
    SEACREST FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +119%
  • TJ
    The JAA Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Health Care Foundation Inc

Managing endowment funds for hebrew health care and affiliates.

—
2
Fund for the Aged Inc

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

Human Services
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System Inc

Newyork-presbyterian healthcare system, inc. ("system, inc.") coordinates membership in the newyork-presbyterian healthcare system, which is an unincorporated federation of separately licensed tax exempt healthcare organizations ("system…

Health
5
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
6
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
7
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
8
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
9
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
Mjhs Medical Associates Pc

The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to practice the profession of medicine for affiliates of metropolitan jewish health system, inc., which provide medical and health services.

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Home for Aged Hebrews; the most unlike its peers is The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
11/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale: $126,370,954 · HealthThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale+11 more: $204,010 · HealthBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $32,338 · PhilanthropyUGC FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 · PhilanthropySEACREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $35,299 · InternationalThe JAA Foundation Inc: $10,000 · OtherNORTHEAST BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH INC: $8,000 · OtherKITTAY HOUSE JEWISH HOME LIFECARE INC: $6,000 · OtherCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC: $6,000 · OtherYOUNG AUDIENCES INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $15,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK FOR GOOD: $12,875 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$126,574,964Philanthropy$71,838International$35,299Other$30,000Arts & Culture$27,500Human Services$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale: $126,370,954 over 7y, 25% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $67,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $42,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $35,299 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUGC FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF JEWISH AGING SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $12,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROSALIND AND JOSEPH GURWIN JEWISH GERIATRIC CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEACREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIVEONNY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITTAY HOUSE JEWISH HOME LIFECARE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED HOME FOR AGED HEBREWS: $5,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home