Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hearthstone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$395kReligion$179kEnvironment$125kHuman Services$112kHousing & Shelter$37kPhilanthropy$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kArts & Culture$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTPORT LAND TRUST$27,000
ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHRIST CHURCH$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
MEDFORD LEAS FUND$5,500
NEEDHAM COMMUNITY COUNCIL$5,000
LUMBERTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BOSTON BULL PEN PROJECT$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
THE CHILDREN'S SCHOOL$2,000
WESTPORT RIVER ALLIANCE$1,000
NEEDHAM HISTORY CENTER$1,000
ROSIE S PLACE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%THE ESTAUGH: $21k → 7%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $100 → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND: $500 → 8%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%PINE STREET INN: $500 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $500 → 16%BABY BASICS: $2k → 7%PINE STREET INN: $500 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $250 → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $100 → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $1k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $500 → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $500 → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $500 → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of The Hearthstone Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Hearthstone Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$845k · 42 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
42

Total granted

$845k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+12%

Still filing today

62%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +51%
  • BB
    Boston Bullpen Project Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +60%
  • WL
    WESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $26k · revenue +181%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue +4%
  • WF
    WATERTOWN FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

7
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
12
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Francis House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Bullpen Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Homeless Services & ShelterIndependent K-8 SchoolsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Government Accountability R…Food Pantries & AssistanceChild and Family ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsPublic University Foundatio…Faith-Based Senior LivingLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%74%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,521

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
30/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH — $103,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCHWESTPORT LAND TRUST — $97,000 · OtherWESTPORT LAND TRUSTIndividual grant recipient — $43,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEDFORD LEAS FUND — $33,250 · OtherMEDFORD LEAS FUNDWELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING INC — $30,000 · OtherWELLESLEY FRIENDS MEETING INCNEEDHAM COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $21,700 · Other+55 more — $128,455 · Other+55 moreELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE — $224,500 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGEDUKE UNIVERSITY — $139,740 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+8 more — $19,333 · EducationTHE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS — $21,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC — $3,750 · Human ServicesBABY BASICS INC — $2,423 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $2,000 · Human Services+3 more — $700 · Human ServicesWESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $26,250 · EnvironmentFOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentWORLD FORESTRY CENTER — $1,500 · EnvironmentBoston Bullpen Project Inc — $26,500 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,500 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR FLINT — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $6,000 · Food & NutritionWESTPORT FOOD PANTRY INC — $500 · Food & NutritionROSIE'S PLACE INC — $3,500 · Housing & ShelterBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC — $213 · Housing & Shelter
Other$456,405Education$383,573Human Services$38,873Environment$30,250Philanthropy$29,000Food & Nutrition$6,500Housing & Shelter$3,713

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE — $224,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $139,740 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Bullpen Project Inc — $26,500 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetWESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $26,250 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEEDHAM COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $21,700 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS — $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIMBALL UNION ACADEMY — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMedford Leas Residents Association — $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $3,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $3,333 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE INC — $2,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,375 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW FUND OF DETROIT MICHIGAN — $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILY NETWORK — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SCHOOL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD FORESTRY CENTER — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $1,033 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPi Kappa Alpha Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FLINT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTPORT FOOD PANTRY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROWEST WOMEN'S FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerica Scores New England DBA Boston Scores — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC — $213 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Boston Bullpen Project Inc
  • Who funds WESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC
  • Who funds NEEDHAM COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS
  • Who funds KIMBALL UNION ACADEMY
  • Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST
  • Who funds Medford Leas Residents Association
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds FOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds BABY BASICS INC
  • Who funds WESTPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds OLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW FUND OF DETROIT MICHIGAN
  • Who funds THE WILY NETWORK
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA18.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Rockland Trust - Blue Hills Charitable Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Aetna Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Lissy Family Foundation · Needham Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hearthstone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc38% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores30% of income from government
  • Italian Home for Children Inc29% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc18% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Needham Community Council Inc2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation1% of income from government
  • Westport Historical Society Inc1% of income from government
  • World Forestry Center0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hearthstone Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hearthstone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph