Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hazel Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$448kCrime & Legal$290kCivil Rights$220kYouth Development$182kHealth$145kInternational$130kArts & Culture$129kRecreation & Sports$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$333k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAINIER ATHLETES$30,000
HERITAGE UNIVERSITY$25,000
ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE$15,000
MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
UKC BASKETBALL CLUB$1,500
ACLU$1,200
SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET$1,000
CYBERGRANTS LLC$1,000
CHILD AID$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$1,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$500
SIERRA CLUB$375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE SOURCE: $2k → 11%EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 9%EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $2k → 9%EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH HOME: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
RI
CA
NE
MD
DC
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 27 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
25

Total granted

$1.5M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $290k · revenue +8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $232k · revenue +46%
  • RA
    RAINIER ATHLETES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $171k · revenue +393% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WA MEDICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH HATFILOH
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Washington Education Association

The mission of the washington education association is to advance the professional interests of its members in order to make public education the best it can be for students, staff, and communities.

—
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Womens Funding Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $231,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON F…Oberlin College: $72,000 · EducationOberlin CollegeHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationHERITAGE UNIVERSITYEverett Public Schools Foundation: $35,500 · EducationEverett Public Schools Fou…+2 more: $6,000 · EducationMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $290,000 · Crime & LegalMISSISSIPPI CENTER …+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONEVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $30,000 · OtherEVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGERAINIER ATHLETES: $30,000 · OtherRAINIER ATHLETESR ATHLETES: $30,000 · OtherR ATHLETESEVERETT SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $22,000 · OtherEVERETT SCHOOL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherPXE INTERNATIONAL INC: $91,000 · OtherPXE INTERNATIONAL INCCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Other+32 more: $106,439 · Other+32 moreALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE: $207,500 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR …RAINIER ATHLETES: $170,583 · Youth DevelopmentRAINIER ATH…CHILD AID: $116,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $13,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalODC: $80,000 · Arts & CulturePAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE BIODATA CONSORTIUM: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$395,000Crime & Legal$291,000Other$394,439Civil Rights$207,500Youth Development$170,583International$130,000Arts & Culture$108,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $290,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $231,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE: $207,500 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetRAINIER ATHLETES: $170,583 over 2y, 32% of budgetCHILD AID: $116,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetPXE INTERNATIONAL INC: $91,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetODC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOberlin College: $72,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEverett Public Schools Foundation: $35,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetPAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetElizabeth Home: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE BIODATA CONSORTIUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWomens Funding Alliance: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPESOURCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKC Basketball Club: $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,385 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATT FINE ARTS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvergreen Mountain Bike Alliance: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $854 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AID ↗
  • Who funds PXE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ODC ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Everett Public Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PAUL TAYLOR DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Home ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE BIODATA CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds Womens Funding Alliance ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOPESOURCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA28× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · United Way of King County · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tides Foundation · David & Cathy Habib Foundation · Peach Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hazel Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hazel Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hazel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph