Skip to content
The Haynes Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Haynes Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Haynes Charitable Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Community Foundation For Monterey County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Haynes Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $46k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’20
11
’21
7
’22
1
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.0MHealth$72kRecreation & Sports$26kHuman Services$22kYouth Development$15kFood & Nutrition$13kEducation$11kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k14 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIBS$11,468
Individual grant recipient$6,000
SALINAS ROTARY CHARITABLE FUND$6,000
HOPE HORSES AND KIDS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION$2,500
COMPASS CHURCH$2,000
OPERATION GIVE BACK$2,000
PUBLIC RECREATION UNLIMITED$2,000
CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW$1,950
RANCHO CIELO$1,000
COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CA$500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 8%SIBS: $11k → 10%TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CA: $500 → 11%RANCHO CIELO: $1k → 12%SMOOTH: $3k → 14%MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%OPERATION GIVE BACK: $2k → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 8%SIBS: $5k → 10%EVERYONE'S HARVEST: $5k → 12%OPERATION GIVE BACK: $1k → 16%THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $1k → 8%EVERYONE'S HARVEST: $5k → 12%NORTH SALINAS HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY: $1.0M → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY: $5k → 12%THE AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $1k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY: $500 → 12%CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW: $5k → 12%CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW: $2k → 12%GIFT INC: $300 → 12%AMERICAN CULINARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%DOROTHY'S KITCHEN: $6k → 12%HOPE HORSES AND KIDS: $5k → 12%SALINAS COMMUNITY YMCA: $3k → 12%HARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $3k → 12%HARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%COMPASS CHURCH: $2k → 12%HOPE HORSES & KIDS: $2k → 12%SALINAS COMMUNITY YMCA: $2k → 12%CENTRAL COAST YMCA: $1k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1k → 12%COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $1k → 12%TORO BULLS BASEBALL: $1k → 12%COMPASS CHURCH: $1k → 12%COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $1k → 12%TYNAN VILLAGE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 16 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$151k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+5%

Still filing today

69%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $11k · revenue +47%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +110%
  • EH
    EVERYONES HARVEST
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • SR
    SALINAS ROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -14%
  • SI
    SMOOTH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +5%
  • NS
    NORTH SALINAS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
2
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
3
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
4
Southern California Grantmakers

Southern california grantmakers (scg) is the regional association for philanthropists and grantmakers working to make a difference in our communities and around the world. we are a leadership hub for our members to connect with each other,…

Philanthropy
5
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
6
California Coast Credit Union

California coast credit union (credit union) is a cooperative, organized for the purpose of promoting thrift and savings among its members, creating a source of credit for them at rates of interest set by the board of directors, and…

—
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
Monterey County Film Commission

To inspire and facilitate film and media production throughout monterey county, creating positive economic impact.

Arts & Culture
9
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
10
California Magic Sc

California Magic SC is a community-based club whose mission is to educate, inspire,and empower youth in a positive way through the beautiful game of soccer.While this small and select club is committed to high achievement in soccer,the…

Recreation & Sports
11
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
12
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Monterey County; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $1,005,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY+1 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropySIBS: $16,218 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherPUCLIC RECREATION UNLIMITED: $7,700 · OtherSALINAS ROTARY CHARITABLE FUND: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3,000 · OtherCOMPASS CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherOPERATION GIVE BACK: $3,000 · OtherSMOOTH INC: $2,500 · Other+9 more: $10,000 · OtherSALINAS VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,500 · HealthNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · HealthCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $4,500 · HealthMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthMONTEREY COUNTY AIRSHOW ASSOC INC: $7,350 · Recreation & SportsHOPE HORSES & KIDS: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsEL CAMINO REAL FUTBOL LEAGUE: $2,392 · Recreation & SportsEVERYONES HARVEST: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationRANCHO CIELO INC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentPUBLIC RECREATION UNLIMITED INC: $2,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,009,500Other$71,918Health$71,500Recreation & Sports$16,742Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$5,000Youth Development$4,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $1,005,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSALINAS VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYONES HARVEST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMONTEREY COUNTY AIRSHOW ASSOC INC: $7,350 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE HORSES & KIDS: $7,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSALINAS ROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $4,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetOPERATION GIVE BACK: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSMOOTH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL CAMINO REAL FUTBOL LEAGUE: $2,392 over 2y, 12% of budgetPUBLIC RECREATION UNLIMITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sally Hughes Church F…Monterey Peninsula Fo…Andrew & Phyllis D'Ar…Nancy Buck Ransom Fou…Pebble Beach Company …Community Foundation …The James Irvine Foun…East Bay Community Fo…Tanimura Family Found…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…
Sally Hughes Church FoundationCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sally Hughes Church Foundation · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Andrew & Phyllis D'Arrigo Charitable Foundation · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · The James Irvine Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Tanimura Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haynes Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haynes Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Haynes Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Haynes Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haynes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home