Skip to content
The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$37kHealth$30kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$7kCivil Rights$6kCommunity Improvement$5kScience & Tech$5kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$283k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$2,500
SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$2,500
ACCESS FUNDS$2,250
ABRAHAM INITIATIVES$2,000
CORAL REEF FOUNDATION$2,000
DEMOCRACY 21 EDUCATION$2,000
BURN INSTITUTE$1,500
REALITY CHANGERS$1,500
CLEAN WATER FUND$1,250
ESSENTIAL PARTNERS$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$500
HOLY APOSTLES SOUP K$500
LEAVE NO TRACE FOUND$500
PUPPIES BEHIND BARS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ESSENTIAL PARTNERS: $1k → 8%ESSENTIAL PARTNERS: $1k → 8%ESSENTIAL PARTNERS: $1k → 8%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $2k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $2k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 24 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$116k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+20%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +7%
  • TA
    THE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +7%
  • A
    ACCESSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • GL
    GRANDMA LULUS TABLE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +20%
  • AF
    Acess Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • SC
    Second Chance San Diego
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fusion Industry Association

The Fusion Industry Association (FIA) is the unified voice of the growing fusion industry. Fusion energy, when commercialized, will revolutionize the global energy system by providing a clean, safe, sustainable form of always-on energy.…

Environment
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Bank Climate Advocates

Bank Climate Advocates (BCA) combats climate change and its adverse effects primarily by using legal advocacy and action to align public financial institutions' investment policies and practices with the 1.5 degrees C warming limitation…

Environment
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Transformca dba Transform

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.

Community Improvement
8
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
9
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
10
Corporate Accountability Lab

The Organization unleashes the creative potential of the law to protect people and the planet from corporate abuse.

International
11
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
12
Public Accountability Initiative Inc

The public accountability initiative conducts research and educational activities that bring transparency to influence public sector and private sector institutions and their key relationship.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Abraham Initiatives Inc; the most unlike its peers is Western Environmental Law Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORAL REEF FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherCORAL REEF FOUNDATIONACESS FUNDS: $8,750 · OtherACESS FUNDSSECOND CHANGE SAN DIEGO: $5,500 · OtherSECOND CHANGE SAN DIEGOFree Software Foundation Inc: $4,500 · OtherFree Software Foundation IncHOLY APOSTLES SOUP K: $4,250 · OtherHOLY APOSTLES SOUP KWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,000 · OtherWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3,350 · OtherWILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherLEAVE NO TRACE FOUND: $3,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION: $3,000 · OtherREALITY CHANGERS: $3,000 · OtherVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2,750 · OtherGRANDMA LULUS TABLE: $2,500 · Other+6 more: $10,000 · Other+6 moreSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $17,500 · Arts & CultureSARCOMA FOUNDAT…CLEAN WATER FUND: $7,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC: $6,000 · InternationalHIAS INC: $2,000 · InternationalPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesESSENTIAL PARTNERS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesBurn Institute: $6,500 · PhilanthropyACCESSITY: $4,500 · Community Improvement
Other$73,100Arts & Culture$17,500Environment$8,500International$8,000Human Services$7,000Philanthropy$6,500Community Improvement$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBurn Institute: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACCESSITY: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFree Software Foundation Inc: $4,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESSENTIAL PARTNERS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREALITY CHANGERS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRANDMA LULUS TABLE: $2,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHIAS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds Burn Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSITY ↗
  • Who funds Free Software Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ESSENTIAL PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GRANDMA LULUS TABLE ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home