Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harvey & Lois Dann Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$933k
Granted FY2021
18
Grants FY2021
8
States reached
$762k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$980kArts & Culture$38kReligion$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kHuman Services$30kHealth$6k
02FY2021 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k11 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $762k
$7,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY PAWLING SCHOOL$762,351
TRINITY COLLEGE$25,000
TRINITY SCHOOL$25,000
AMISTAD MISSION$25,000
BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE MINIST$25,000
THE CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$10,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$10,000
JACKSONVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$7,500
THE SAGE COLLEGES$7,500
EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL$5,000
GRACE SMITH HOUSE$5,000
PHILLIPS ACADEMY ANDOVER$5,000
THE HILL SCHOOL$5,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY SCHO$5,000
HOOD COLLEGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $10k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $5k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $3k → 9%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%THE CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $2k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $1k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MD
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$1.1M
$0

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRINITY COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $43k · revenue +31%
  • JS
    Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $24k · revenue +77%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $18k · revenue +180%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    2
    Wilson College

    Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

    Education
    3
    Emmanuel College

    Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

    Education
    4
    The Harpeth Hall School

    Harpeth hall is an independent, college preparatory school for girls and young women in grades five through twelve.

    Education
    5
    Hampden-Sydney College

    Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

    Education
    6
    Dean College

    Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

    Education
    7
    Hillsdale College

    Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

    Education
    8
    President and Trustees of Bates College

    Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

    Education
    9
    Sarah Lawrence College

    At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

    Education
    10
    Williams College

    Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

    Education
    11
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    12
    Hobart and William Smith Colleges

    Hobart and william smith prepares students to lead lives of consequence.

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hill School; the most unlike its peers is Pawling Concert Series Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    12/12
    Grantees still filing
    10/12
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION: $788,851 · EducationTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATIONTRINITY COLLEGE: $42,500 · Education+5 more: $76,500 · Education+5 moreTRINITY SCHOOL: $49,000 · OtherTRINITY SCHOOLBEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE MINIST: $33,000 · OtherBEACHES EMERGE…AMISTAD MISSION: $31,000 · OtherAMISTAD MISSIO…PRINCETON UNIVERSITY SCHO: $13,500 · OtherPRINCETON UNIV…PHILLIPS ACADEMY ANDOVER: $10,000 · OtherPHILLIPS ACADE…HOLY TRINITY CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · OtherJacksonville Symphony Association Inc: $24,000 · Arts & CulturePAWLING CONCERT SERIES INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureAKIN HALL ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $11,500 · Human Services
    Education$907,851Other$148,500Arts & Culture$37,500Human Services$29,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION: $788,851 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville Symphony Association Inc: $24,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOOD COLLEGE: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAWLING CONCERT SERIES INC: $9,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetAKIN HALL ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
    • Who funds Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC ↗
    • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
    • Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds HOOD COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
    • Who funds PAWLING CONCERT SERIES INC ↗
    • Who funds AKIN HALL ASSOCIATION ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Ibm International FoundationNY12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Harvey & Lois Dann Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harvey & Lois Dann Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Harvey & Lois Dann Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to The Harvey & Lois Dann Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Harvey & Lois Dann’s filings →

      More from the funding graph