Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harvey and Aileen Kleiman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$49kReligion$41kArts & Culture$35kHuman Services$19kPhilanthropy$16kHousing & Shelter$8kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$350
Median grant
5
States reached
$468k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JARC$5,000
SUNDRY$3,457
TEMPLE ISRAEL$3,450
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$2,500
DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$1,800
HEBREW FREE LOAN$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DETROIT$1,225
UNITED FOUNDATION$1,000
JEWISH SENIOR LIFE$1,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAELI DEFENSE FOR - NY$600
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$400
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $510 → 8%JARC: $10k → 8%JARC: $9k → 8%JARC: $8k → 8%JARC: $8k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 43 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
5

Total granted

$306k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+23%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +36%
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +14%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • S1
    SUNDRY 150
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • C
    CHABAD
    one grant, 2021 · $475
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG
    one grant, 2024 · $350 · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
10
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
11
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
12
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $111,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $20,950 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROITADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $10,695 · OtherSUNDRY 250: $7,467 · Other+39 more: $69,407 · Other+39 moreJARC: $40,150 · Human ServicesJARCJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $6,260 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SE…DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $17,100 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYM…THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $10,500 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT…DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $2,230 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUB…HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $1,250 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $525 · Arts & CultureHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $8,500 · PhilanthropyGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $4,150 · EmploymentFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $1,800 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $1,370 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,875 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $350 · International
Other$220,219Human Services$46,410Arts & Culture$31,605Philanthropy$8,500Employment$4,150Food & Nutrition$3,170International$2,225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJARC: $40,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $17,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKADIMA: $7,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $6,260 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $4,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,650 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYAD EZRA: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $2,230 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,925 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,875 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $1,370 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOTS: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT OPERA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KADIMA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Ravitz Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Eunice & Milton H Ring Charitable Foundation · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harvey and Aileen Kleiman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harvey and Aileen Kleiman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harvey and Aileen Kleiman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph