Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harry and Pam Chapman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$394kHuman Services$115kHealth$107kEducation$2kYouth Development$2kHousing & Shelter$2kFood & Nutrition$1kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$20,960
Median grant
1
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KATY CARES$20,960
ST PETERS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%FORT BEND SENIORS MEALS-ON-WHEELS: $50 → 8%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%RAISEUP FAMILIES: $3k → 16%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%RAISEUP FAMILIES: $500 → 16%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $250 → 16%LIVING WATERS INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 8%RAISEUP FAMILIES: $500 → 16%LIVING WATERS INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 8%NEIBORHOOD KIDZ CLUB: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$555k · 39 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
32

Total granted

$555k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+59%

Still filing today

49%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KATY CARES INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $107k · revenue +13%
  • CC
    Christ Clinic
    5× · 2018–2022 · $80k · revenue +54%
  • TB
    THE BIBLE SEMINARY
    2× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CO
    CITY OF REFUGEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +68%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF BARNABAS PARTNERS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
11
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Greater Houston Prayer Breakfast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersVeteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Development CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsPublic School District Foun…Senior Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child and Family Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%3%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%75%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr10%3%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,764

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
30/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKSBJ — $100,000 · OtherKSBJIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+43 more — $57,703 · Other+43 moreKATY CARES INC — $106,822 · Food & NutritionKATY CARES INCChrist Clinic — $79,836 · HealthChrist ClinicST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…+7 more — $2,075 · HealthCITY OF REFUGE — $25,000 · ReligionTHE BIBLE SEMINARY — $11,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Education+2 more — $400 · EducationRAISEUP FAMILIES — $3,500 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,250 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD KIDZ CLUB — $1,000 · Human ServicesMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $250 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $250 · Human Services+2 more — $250 · Human ServicesGREATER HOUSTON PRAYER BREAKFAST — $2,150 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $600 · Philanthropy
Other$382,703Food & Nutrition$106,822Health$89,411Religion$25,000Education$13,400Human Services$7,000Philanthropy$2,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKATY CARES INC — $106,822 over 5y, 23% of budgetChrist Clinic — $79,836 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BIBLE SEMINARY — $11,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAISEUP FAMILIES — $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $1,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD KIDZ CLUB — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOLAY INTERNATIONAL — $400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Medical Foundation — $350 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Legion — $250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $225 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Water International — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER FUND INC A NJ NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KATY CARES INC
  • Who funds Christ Clinic
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE
  • Who funds THE BIBLE SEMINARY
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds RAISEUP FAMILIES
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON PRAYER BREAKFAST
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD KIDZ CLUB
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds DEMOLAY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Baylor Medical Foundation
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX19.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harry and Pam Chapman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • The Treehouse Foundation Inc23% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph