· Private foundation
The Harry and Catherine Halloran Family Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HONEYWELL ARTS ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| PROJECT HOME | $7,500 |
| MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $5,300 |
| GUADALUPE CENTER | $5,000 |
| PLAY ON PHILLY | $5,000 |
| MERCY SHIPS | $3,000 |
| SEEQS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| PHILABUNDANCE | $2,500 |
| FACE TO FACE | $2,000 |
| MISSIONARY SISTERS OF HOLY ROSARY | $1,500 |
| INDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS | $1,000 |
| THE SCHOOL IN ROSE VALLEY | $1,000 |
| MERION MERCY ACADEMY | $1,000 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY | $500 |
| RADNOR MEMORIAL LIBRARY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPROJECT HOME7× · 2018–2024 · $36k · revenue +12%
- MCMANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS3× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +245%
- TJTHE JOSEPH FUND INC2× · 2022–2023 · $28k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- GPGLOBAL PHILADELPHIA ASSOCIATON INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +48%
- GCGEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCH OF MEDgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +34%
- ECENTERPRISE CENTERone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…
Charter school providing students a content rich, adademically rigerous core knowledge education with a well-defined, sequential curriculum in a safe, orderly disiplined and caring environment.
Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Provide a rigorous education and encourage pursuit of knowledge as preparation for life and work.
Philadelphia montessori charter school (pmcs) excels at providing children in kindergarten through 4th grade with a montessori education in an environment that nurtures the whole child, celebrates inclusion, embraces innovation, and…
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Russell Byers Charter School and the most unlike its peers is Furnish With Love Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE JOSEPH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY ON PHILLY ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds BYERSCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MENTORING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PHILADELPHIA ASSOCIATON INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCH OF MED ↗
- Who funds THE HONEYWELL ARTS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION TOWN MEDIA ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOOL IN ROSE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds KIPP PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WHYY INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds ALS Association Western Pennsylvania Chapter ↗
- Who funds BREASTCANCERORG ↗
- Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENTREPRENEUR WORKS FUND ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPHS CARPENTER SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ST MALACHY ↗
- Who funds SEEQS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL BYERS CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FURNISH WITH LOVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Connelly Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Maguire Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Paul E Kelly Foundation · The Harry R Halloran Jr Charitable Trust · Hamilton Family Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Harry and Catherine Halloran Family Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Harry and Catherine Halloran Family Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Harry and Catherine Halloran Family Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.