Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harold Hamm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$46MHealth$1.4MArts & Culture$1.3MPublic Benefit$125kHuman Services$95kAnimals$45kReligion$30kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.5M
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OU FOUNDATION$3,988,990
AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE$497,467
HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION$30,000
PENFED FOUNDATION$10,000
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC$5,000
YWCA OKLAHOMA CITY$5,000
OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME$1,000
SOONERS HELPING SOONERS INC$1,000
ENID PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$250
NICHOLA HILLS PARKS INC$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 15%DENNY PRICE FAMILY YWCA: $2k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $25k → 16%Denny Price Family YWCA: $2k → 16%Denny Price Family YWCA: $2k → 16%YWCA OKC: $10k → 16%YWCA OKC: $5k → 16%YWCA OKC: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $5k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 51% of The Harold Hamm Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 26% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Harold Hamm Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 51% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36M · 15 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
24

Total granted

$36M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+7%

Still filing today

80%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $503k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    2× · 2022–2024 · $25M · revenue +8%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +17%
  • NH
    NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Mary
    one grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue +8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FD
    one grant, 2024 · $1.4M
  • NC
    NATIONAL COWBOY HALL OF FAME
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

3
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
4
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
5
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
6
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
7
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
8
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
9
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
10
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is University of Mary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Oklahoma State University Foundation — $25,005,174 · EducationOklahoma State University FoundationUniversity of Mary — $10,200,453 · EducationUniversity of MaryUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $10,021,434 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $607,467 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FD — $1,424,600 · OtherNATIONAL COWBOY HALL OF FAME — $1,025,505 · Other+25 more — $222,972 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC — $249,999 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE FOR CITIZEN FOCUSED SERVICE — $125,000 · Public BenefitJesus House Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI — $20,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC — $6,850 · Recreation & Sports
Education$45,834,528Other$2,673,077Arts & Culture$252,999Public Benefit$125,000Human Services$64,500Youth Development$7,000Recreation & Sports$6,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $25,005,174 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetUniversity of Mary — $10,200,453 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $10,021,434 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC — $249,999 over 3y, 25% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CITIZEN FOCUSED SERVICE — $125,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $110,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJesus House Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC — $6,850 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOONERS HELPING SOONERS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Servant Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Dobson Family Foundation · Presbyterian Health Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harold Hamm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Harold Hamm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Harold Hamm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph