Skip to content
The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation) at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation)

To create public awareness of the need for cancer research by conducting a fundraising dinner/auction and educating attendees of the need for cancer research.

$639k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$603k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.4MRecreation & Sports$135kYouth Development$98kHuman Services$70kEducation$60kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$25kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $603k
$602,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$516k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL$602,500
PROJECT FUTURE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FULL OF GRACE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 8%SDSI FOUNDATION: $13k → 12%MIKE TYSON CARES: $40k → 12%THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%MIKE TYSON CARES: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
WV
KS
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 7 repeat orgs$371k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
19

Total granted

$6.5M
$346k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +2%
  • LD
    LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +167%
  • KF
    Kyles Family Foundation
    4× · 2019–2023 · $41k · revenue +402% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • BD
    BREES DREAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -18%
  • TM
    THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +36%
  • DM
    DALLAS MAVERICKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
The David Mduffy Jr Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates Llp
Philanthropy
3
The Dylan Williams Forever an All Star Foundation
Unclassified
4
Tyrese Maxey Foundation
Youth Development
5
John Jordan Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Bigger Than Ball Foundation
Recreation & Sports
7
The Dustin J Wells Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Michael-Gene Kids Basketball Foundation
Human Services
9
The Deangelo Williams Foundation
—
10
Jeremy Lin Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Victory Sports Foundation
—
12
The Will Smith Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Michael Phelps Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mr October Foundation for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6,277,250 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+5 more: $120,000 · PhilanthropyMike Tyson Cares Inc: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesFULL OF GRACE FOUNDATION INC: $5,252 · Human ServicesLos Angeles Bible Training School: $25,000 · OtherPROJECT FUTURE INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE JUMP AND BALL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherMAGIC JOHNSON FOUNDATION INC: $13,200 · OtherCINCINNATI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherLADYLIKE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS: $10,000 · OtherLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthLIFEDRIVEN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthKyles Family Foundation: $40,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG WARRIORS: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentGATEWAY PGA REACH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMr October Foundation for Kids: $25,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$6,397,250Human Services$132,752Other$118,200Health$80,000Youth Development$68,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6,277,250 over 8y, 15% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBREES DREAM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetKyles Family Foundation: $40,500 over 4y, 27% of budgetDALLAS MAVERICKS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMr October Foundation for Kids: $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLos Angeles Bible Training School: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JUMP AND BALL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetYOUNG WARRIORS: $17,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetPat & Emmitt Smith Charities: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLADYLIKE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRIS TUCKER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLIFEDRIVEN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCINCINNATI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY PGA REACH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFULL OF GRACE FOUNDATION INC: $5,252 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation)?

    Find your warmest path to The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home