Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Happy Way Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$192kEducation$79kReligion$45kArts & Culture$25kPhilanthropy$11kCrime & Legal$11kCivil Rights$11kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$6,165
GLOBAL GIVING$4,000
VOLMOED YOUTH LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM$4,000
ALS ASSOCIATION INDIANA CHAPTER$3,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH$2,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF BLOOMINGTON$1,000
HOTELS FOR HOMELESS$1,000
FRIENDS OF TENT OF NATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%POOR PEOPLE'S CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 14%FORT WAYNE FOR REFUGEES INC: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
AZ
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$382k · 28 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
22

Total granted

$382k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+154%

Still filing today

54%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INDIANA CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $169k · revenue +80%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINIC INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +88%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM
    6× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • ER
    EMMAUS ROAD MENNONITE FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TC
    TZEDEK CHICAGO
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Alliance for Middle East Peace Inc

The alliance for middle east peace (allmep) leads a network of 200+ civil society organizations working to create the conditions for security, peace, and freedom for both israelis and palestinians. our member ngos build trust,…

Arts & Culture
3
American Friends of Combatants for Peace Inc

(part iii, line 1) american friends of combatants for peace is a diverse community working in solidarity with combatants for peace. afcfp raises awareness and resources, builds community, and takes direct action to advance the goal of a…

Education
4
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
5
Center for Religion and Diplomacy Inc

Bridging religious considerations with global peacebuilding policy and practice

International
6
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
7
Institute for Climate and Peace

The mission of the institute for climate and peace is to advance effective and inclusive processes to build peaceful and climate-conscious futures for the most vulnerable.

Environment
8
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
11
Peace Learning Center Inc

Peace learning center of indianapolis facilitates community learning that acts as a catalyst for peace, equity and justice and the implementation of innovative practices. the organization's vision is a healed world where strong and caring…

Crime & Legal
12
Peace Direct Inc

Peace direct is an international organization working with local peacebuilders and other allies to shift power and resources for sustainable peace. we believe that local people should be at the center of defining and driving peacebuilding…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Families for Children Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Fort Wayne for Refugeesinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIANA CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE: $169,250 · InternationalINDIANA CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACEFRIENDS OF AL-ROWWAD USA INC: $8,000 · International+2 more: $6,750 · InternationalFRIENDS OF SABEEL NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SABEEL NORTH AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $9,748 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSACRED HEART CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCHFOTONNA FRIENDS OF TENT OF NATIONS: $9,000 · OtherFOTONNA FRIENDS OF TENT OF NATIONSWIAM CENTER: $8,000 · OtherWIAM CENTERPILGRIMS OF IBILLIN: $8,000 · OtherPILGRIMS OF IBILLINAMERICA FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE- MIDWEST OFFICE: $7,500 · OtherAMERICA FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE- MI…SLEEPING BEAR HERITAGE TRAIL: $7,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $6,165 · OtherCANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $6,000 · OtherEMMAUS ROAD MENNONITE FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 · Other+34 more: $54,028 · Other+34 moreCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $59,000 · EducationCANTERBURY SCHOOL…UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $7,500 · EducationUNION THEOLOGICAL…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM: $8,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINIC INC: $10,500 · Crime & LegalLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $8,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $7,000 · Arts & Culture
International$184,000Other$139,441Education$66,500Philanthropy$11,000Crime & Legal$10,500Environment$8,000Arts & Culture$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIANA CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE: $169,250 over 8y, 22% of budgetCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $59,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINIC INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM: $8,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF AL-ROWWAD USA INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $4,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE TRAILS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE FOR REFUGEESINC: $1,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDIANA CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTS CIRCLE - FAMILIES FORUM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AL-ROWWAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne IncIN17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Dorset Charitable Trust · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · The James Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Happy Way Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Happy Way Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Happy Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph