Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hannah & Ryan Barry Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$253kHealth$148kHuman Services$113kYouth Development$65kCommunity Improvement$60kRecreation & Sports$40kCivil Rights$40kReligion$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGES$27,500
WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE$25,000
SUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITY$15,000
LSA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE$12,000
ARBOR BROTHERS INC$10,000
DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY$10,000
VOOM FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRIDGES: $28k → 14%BRIDGES: $28k → 14%EXPANDED SCHOOLS: $10k → 17%EXPANDED SCHOOLS: $10k → 17%EXPANDED SCHOOLS: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 15 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$633k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+20%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DG
    DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $56k · revenue +126%
  • RI
    ROCKLAND INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC DBA BRIDGES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +8%
  • ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING
    4× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE ST PAULS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • CC
    CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • PI
    PARENTCHILD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kipp New York Inc

Kipp new york inc., being a part of the kipp nyc public charter schools, aims to create schools in bronx, brooklyn, and manhattan that prepare students for college, career, and beyond.

Education
2
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
3
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
4
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
5
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
6
Riverbank Charter School of Excellence

The Mission of Riverbank Charter School of Excellence is to provide students with opportunities to develop their intellectual, emotional, and social potential through the implementation of a dynamic curriculum that fosters learning through…

Education
7
German International School New York

To provide pre-kindergarten through grade 12 college preparatory education, growing students into socially and environmentally aware global citizens in a multi-lingual, cross-cultural setting.

Arts & Culture
8
Harlem Children's Zone Promise Academy Charter School Ii

To provide high quality, standards-based academic programs for students, grades k-12.

Education
9
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
10
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
11
Cristo Rey Brooklyn High School

Cristo rey brooklyn is a catholic high school partnering with families of all creeds to educate deserving young people from underserved communities to become men and women of faith, purpose, and service. by integrating a rigorous…

—
12
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Expanded Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Voom Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ST PAULS SCHOOLS INC: $100,000 · OtherTHE ST PAULS SCHOOLS INCSUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITY: $70,000 · OtherSUMMER SEARCH NEW YORK CITYLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $59,500 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INCWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $50,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversNAOMI BERRIE DIABETES CENTER: $30,000 · OtherNAOMI BERRIE DIABETES CENTERTHE ST PAULS SCHOOL: $27,500 · OtherTHE ST PAULS SCHOOLFRIENDS OF AMERICAN U OF AFGHANISTAN: $25,000 · OtherKIDSBRIDGE INC: $25,000 · OtherCITIZEN'S COMMITEE FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · OtherCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $50,000 · Other+4 moreROCKLAND INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC DBA BRIDGES: $55,000 · Human ServicesROCKLAND IND…EXPANDED SCHOOLS INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesEXPANDED SCH…DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC: $55,500 · EducationDANBURY GR…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $10,000 · EducationICAHN SCHO…ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING: $50,000 · PhilanthropyKucetekela Foundation: $40,000 · InternationalCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE VOOM FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Health
Other$477,000Human Services$83,000Education$65,500Philanthropy$50,000International$40,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $59,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC: $55,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetROCKLAND INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC DBA BRIDGES: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING: $50,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetKucetekela Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetEXPANDED SCHOOLS INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSBRIDGE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARENTCHILD INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOOM FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKLAND INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC DBA BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING ↗
  • Who funds Kucetekela Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EXPANDED SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDSBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds THE VOOM FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hannah & Ryan Barry Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hannah & Ryan Barry Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hannah & Ryan Barry Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hannah & Ryan Barry Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hannah & Ryan Barry Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph