Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hanley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$849k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$236k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MEducation$953kYouth Development$719kHousing & Shelter$660kEnvironment$478kFood & Nutrition$346kInternational$241kPhilanthropy$235kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $651k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WENDT CENTER FOR LOSSHEALING$236,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON$150,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
SPARK THE JOURNEY$100,000
FRIENDSHIP PLACE$65,000
ASYLUM WORKS$40,000
WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE$35,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$25,000
CHILDREN OF UGANDA$15,000
DUMBARTON ARTS AND EDUCATION$10,000
NEGOTIATION WORKS$7,500
ISSA TRUST FOUNDATION$6,000
CHRIST HOUSE$5,000
MUTTVILLE$5,000
48 HILLS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SIENA HOUSE: $1k → 28%URBAN ANGELS SF: $5k → 10%CHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT: $1k → 10%ALANO CLUB OF LAHAINA INC: $5k → 9%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $8k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $8k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $8k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $5k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $5k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
MA
CT
CA
WV
VA
MD
AR
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 63 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

63 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
25

Total granted

$4.9M
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+3%

Still filing today

79%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $713k · revenue +74%
  • FP
    Friendship Place
    9× · 2017–2025 · $485k · revenue +104%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WILLIAM C BAKER BUILDING A BETTER FUTURE FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • LH
    LINC HOUSING CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +277%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spur Local Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/77
Grantees still filing
52/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WENDT CENTER FOR LOSSHEALING: $1,089,000 · OtherWENDT CENTER FOR LOSSHEALINGBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $712,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATETHE WILLIAM C BAKER BUILDING A BETTER FUTURE FUND: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+50 more: $700,750 · Other+50 moreSPARK THE JOURNEY: $849,000 · EducationSPARK THE JOURNEY+11 more: $141,500 · Education+11 moreFriendship Place: $485,000 · Housing & ShelterFriendship …LINC HOUSING CORPORATION: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBOLINAS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterChrist House: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAK…OCEANA INC: $17,250 · Environment+10 more: $79,000 · Environment+10 moreMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $260,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $32,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $5,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN OF UGANDA: $75,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 · InternationalAsylumWorks: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,000 · International+2 more: $8,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC: $72,500 · PhilanthropyISSA TRUST FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 · PhilanthropyOMPRAKASH INC: $24,500 · PhilanthropySPUR LOCAL INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,702,250Education$990,500Housing & Shelter$552,500Environment$446,250Food & Nutrition$298,000International$232,000Philanthropy$139,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARK THE JOURNEY: $849,000 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $712,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetFriendship Place: $485,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $260,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $79,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF UGANDA: $75,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC: $72,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDUMBARTON ARTS AND EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEGOTIATION WORKS: $37,500 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $32,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK: $31,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetISSA TRUST FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBULLIS SCHOOL: $29,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLINC HOUSING CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOMPRAKASH INC: $24,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBOLINAS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $22,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH COALITION: $22,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChrist House: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC: $17,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN ACADEMY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRoots & Branches Conservancy: $10,500 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetAcadia Center: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaui Huliau Foundation: $10,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNA KOA MANU CONSERVATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPoint Reyes National Seashore Association: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMission Local SF Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALANO CLUB OF LAHAINA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMAS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGREENWICH BOTANICAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARK THE JOURNEY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Place ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUMBARTON ARTS AND EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AsylumWorks ↗
  • Who funds NEGOTIATION WORKS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ISSA TRUST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds BULLIS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LINC HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OMPRAKASH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOLINAS COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH COALITION ↗
  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ House ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARIN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC26.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The San Francisco Foundation · Corina Higginson Trust Co Laura Ford Trustee · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hanley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hanley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hanley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hanley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hanley’s filings →

More from the funding graph