Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hanley Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$4.6MHousing & Shelter$452kHuman Services$413kCrime & Legal$170kPublic Benefit$100kReligion$100kEducation$89kCivil Rights$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION$2,050,000
TROSA INC$100,000
GREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS$50,000
NO LONGER BOUND$25,000
HARBOR HOMES INC$25,000
LIFEGATE COUNSELING CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $198k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAMARITAN INNS INC: $25k → 14%FERN HOUSE INC: $48k → 11%SAMARITAN COLONY INC: $75k → 23%MARY HALL FREEDOM HOUSE INC: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 21 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
35

Total granted

$4.6M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+29%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue ×11
  • TR
    TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +13%
  • BO
    BRIDGES OF IOWA
    3× · 2018–2023 · $170k · revenue +612%

Funded once

  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
    one grant, 2017 · $195k
  • VR
    VETERANS RECOVERY RESOURCESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +669%
  • SC
    SAMARITAN COLONY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
River Bend Recovery

A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.

Health
2
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
3
House of Hope for Recovery Inc

Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.

—
4
Gosnold Inc

Gosnold, inc. was established for the rehabilitation of substance abusers and offers addiction and mental health treatment on an in-patient and out-patient basis.

—
5
Crossroads Recovery House
—
6
Harbor House Inc of Fort Smith

To help individuals recover from alcohol and drug addictions

—
7
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
8
Sacramento Recovery House Inc

Sacramento Recovery House, Inc., is dedicated to providing gender responsive, trauma informed, residential services to adult persons seeking recovery from substance use disorders.

Health
9
Alcoholism & Addiction Assistance Association Inc

Providing clean, safe, sober living environments for newly recovered drug addicts and alcoholics who truly have the desire to change their lives.

—
10
New Hope Integrated Behavioral Health Care Inc

New hope integrated behavioral health care, inc., a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, provides commission on the accreditation of rehabilitation facilities (carf) and nj licensed substance use and co-occurring mental health disorder…

—
11
Recovery Network of Programs Inc

To provide comprehensive care and expert recovery services to any individual or family on their journey to restore hope, health, and healing; to empower those in need to get the compassionate and personalized support they deserve to help…

Health
12
Harwood House

To provide non-hospital, in-patient treatment to adult men and women recovering from drug and alcohol dependence.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Renewal House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oregon State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Affordable Housing Construc…Senior Support ServicesAddiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%72%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,517

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
37/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $2,790,000 · HealthHANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INCBRIDGES OF IOWA — $170,000 · HealthRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $152,000 · Health+18 more — $810,500 · Health+18 moreTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC — $240,000 · OtherTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS …Individual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $195,200 · OtherWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH…THE RETREAT — $150,000 · OtherTHE RETREATStep Denver — $92,500 · OtherStep DenverTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE — $60,000 · Other+19 more — $651,500 · Other+19 moreSAMARITAN COLONY INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesMary Hall Freedom Village Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesFERN HOUSE INC — $48,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN INNS INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Extension Inc — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHarbor Homes Inc — $32,000 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS RECOVERY RESOURCES — $100,000 · Public BenefitHARBOR HALL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Community ImprovementSTEPPING STONES INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $90,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$3,922,500Other$1,589,200Human Services$198,000Housing & Shelter$157,000Public Benefit$100,000Community Improvement$100,000Crime & Legal$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $2,790,000 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC — $240,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBRIDGES OF IOWA — $170,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $152,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetGREAT LAKES RECOVERY CENTERS INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVETERANS RECOVERY RESOURCES — $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetStep Denver — $92,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWelcome House Inc — $80,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN COLONY INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE — $60,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $51,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROSECRANCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANSEN FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetValley Hope Association Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASHLEY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUMBERLAND HEIGHTS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMontford Hall — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Extension Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHARBOR HALL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JUDE HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNO LONGER BOUND INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMary Hall Freedom Village Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFERN HOUSE INC — $48,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetVICTORY PROGRAMS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOregon State University Foundation — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPLY GRACE — $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY & FAMILY RESOURCES — $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYork County Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Inc — $37,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTEP 2 INC — $35,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHarbor Homes Inc — $32,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency — $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDAMASCUS ROAD RECOVERY INC — $28,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HALL INC — $26,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN INNS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetStella Maris Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA HOME INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREGION TEN COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE SOBER LIVING — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSA HEALTH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Slave 2 Nothing Found…J Bulow Campbell Foun…The Community Foundat…Georgia Power Foundat…Truist Foundation IncEquitable Foundation …Foundation for the Ca…The Bank of America C…Baird Foundation IncEnterprise Holdings F…Raymond James Charita…AbbVie Foundation
Slave 2 Nothing FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Slave 2 Nothing Foundation · J Bulow Campbell Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Equitable Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · AbbVie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hanley Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
  • The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Hansen Foundation Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hanley Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Hanley Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines