Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Handler Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$138kEducation$75kRecreation & Sports$54kEnvironment$31kHealth$18kHuman Services$11kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$394
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PACIFIC WILD ALLIANCE$5,000
ANIMAL NATION INC$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHE'S THE FIRST: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
DE
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$178k · 6 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
35

Total granted

$178k
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+29%

Still filing today

83%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’24
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $124k · revenue +6%
  • HP
    HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k · revenue +25%
  • TA
    The Abraham Foundation
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $54k · revenue +22%
  • AP
    AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +214%
  • THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
8
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
9
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
12
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is She's the First Inc and the most unlike its peers is Young Investors Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Jewish Heritage & Israel Su…Disease Research & Patient …New York Civic OrganizationsPerforming Arts TheaterGirls and Women EmpowermentCharter and Independent Sch…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%34%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr19%58%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,721

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
28/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $123,733 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INCPACIFIC WILD ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 · Animals+2 more — $3,550 · AnimalsUrban Arts Partnership — $35,000 · OtherUrban Arts PartnershipIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HOME OF THE BRAVE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherTHE HOME OF THE BRAVE FOUNDATIONCARAMORE — $7,500 · OtherCARAMOREHIAS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HILLTOP HANOVER — $5,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF ACTION FUND — $5,000 · OtherThe Abraham Foundation — $6,000 · OtherSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $7,500 · OtherSHE'S THE FIRST INCHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN — $7,500 · OtherHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENTURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE — $5,000 · Other+14 more — $11,870 · Other+14 moreHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $53,550 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE WAL…THE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $25,000 · EducationTHE WINDW…THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationTHE ROCKE…+3 more — $2,500 · Education+3 moreAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Environment+1 more — $250 · EnvironmentLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $5,000 · Arts & CultureGARTH FAGAN DANCE INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureDMF YOUTH INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureONLY MAKE BELIEVE INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSESAME WORKSHOP — $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $60 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $1,000 · Health
Animals$132,283Other$121,370Recreation & Sports$53,550Education$32,500Environment$25,250Arts & Culture$11,060Health$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $123,733 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $53,550 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUrban Arts Partnership — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE BRAVE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN — $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Abraham Foundation — $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC WILD ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF ACTION FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARTH FAGAN DANCE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL NATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDMF YOUTH INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Childrens Academy — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONLY MAKE BELIEVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Investors Society — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAsha Partners — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Enviromental Literacy Fdn — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LELT FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALM CHARITIES INC — $320 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Tides Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Handler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Liberty Science Center14% of income from government
  • The Home of the Brave Foundation8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Handler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Handler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph