Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Halverson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$174kInternational$73kRecreation & Sports$51kEnvironment$39kHealth$37kPublic Benefit$31kFood & Nutrition$27kHuman Services$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$500
Median grant
10
States reached
$924k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YAMPA RIVER BOTANIC PARK$30,000
AFRICA SCHOOL ASSISTANCE PROJECT$10,000
ALAYA PRESCHOOL$10,000
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$3,000
LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY$3,000
WESTERN RESILIENCE CENTER$2,500
URBAN PEAK$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTN$2,000
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY ETHICS$2,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$2,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$2,000
SOUTHERN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$1,000
PROPUBLICA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LUV MICHAEL: $250 → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $3k → 6%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $3k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $2k → 12%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $3k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $3k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $3k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $1k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $1k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $1k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $1k → 6%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $1k → 6%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $1k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $1k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
WI
NY
MA
WY
OH
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$489k · 50 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
22

Total granted

$489k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+17%

Still filing today

70%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YR
    YAMPA RIVER BOTANIC PARK SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +814%
  • KD
    KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +75%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • NI
    NLSHIMACHI INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • MC
    METRO CARINGgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
8
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mongabay Org Corp; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/57
Grantees still filing
44/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALAYA PRESCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherALAYA PRESCHOOLWHEN WE ALL VOTE ACT BLUE: $18,000 · OtherWHEN WE ALL VOTE ACT BLUEPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTN: $15,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTNIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $13,000 · OtherDOCTOR WITHOUT BORDERS USA INCWHITTIER SCHOOL: $12,500 · OtherWHITTIER SCHOOLNONPROFITVOTEORG: $11,500 · OtherURBAN PEAK: $7,500 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATIONPRO PUBLICA INC: $9,000 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Other+40 more: $62,035 · Other+40 moreKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $46,250 · EducationKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $40,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO …Trustees of Dartmouth College: $8,250 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth C…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,250 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES O…THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $4,500 · Education+6 more: $10,900 · Education+6 moreYAMPA RIVER BOTANIC PARK SOCIETY: $50,000 · EnvironmentYAMPA RIVER BOT…THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $17,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS …SOUTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT: $3,000 · Environment+6 more: $4,250 · Environment+6 moreAFRICA SCHOOL ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $45,000 · InternationalAFRICA SCHOOL …THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $18,500 · InternationalTHE UNION OF C…INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $6,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL …NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $21,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $9,046 · Health+2 more: $1,250 · HealthLift Up of Routt County: $17,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · Human Services+2 more: $750 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $14,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $9,250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$216,035Education$116,400Environment$74,250International$69,500Health$31,296Human Services$23,750Food & Nutrition$23,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAMPA RIVER BOTANIC PARK SOCIETY: $50,000 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $46,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICA SCHOOL ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $45,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $40,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $21,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLift Up of Routt County: $17,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $9,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $9,046 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $8,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $5,995 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $3,875 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY: $2,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO: $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNISHIMACHI FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThistle Community Housing: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNaropa University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Notebook Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT INNERSPACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAMPA RIVER BOTANIC PARK SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA SCHOOL ASSISTANCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Lift Up of Routt County ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds METRO CARING ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO26.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Records Johnston Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Halverson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Halverson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Project Innerspace Inc: 34% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Halverson’s filings →

More from the funding graph