Skip to content
The Haider Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Haider Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$73kCivil Rights$30kReligion$13kYouth Development$9kHuman Services$3kHealth$3kArts & Culture$2kFood & Nutrition$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE$6,250
UKAA ENDOWMENT FUND$6,000
CENTRE FOR DIALOUGE PEACE AND ACTIO$2,500
EDU GIRLS$2,000
WETA$400
MPT$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 14 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$111k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+63%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +14%
  • EI
    EDU-GIRLS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +132%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • DD
    DIL DEVELOPMENT IN LITERACY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI Agraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +116%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
2
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
3
Friends of the American University of Afghanistan

Friends of the american university of afghanistan (fauaf) is a 501(c)(3) public charity that advances higher education for afghan students by funding academic operations, scholarships, extracurricular activities, and bridge programming at…

International
4
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
6
United Nations International School

Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…

Education
7
Uswa Educational Association

Uswa educational association is committed to helping the poor and needy children, focused on pakistan. children's educational needs are helped through schools, such as the one established by jabir bin haya trust, islamabad, pakistan. this…

International
8
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
9
Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation

Asian university for women (auw) seeks to offer high quality education to young women of extraordinary talents drawn from diverse national, ethnic, religious, and socio-economic backgrounds. see schedule o for continuation.it is open to…

Education
10
The American University of Iraq Foundation Inc

To promote higher education in iraq based on the american liberal arts model.

Education
11
Ek Kadam Aur

Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.

International
12
Association of Pakistani Women in America Inc

Help disabled women and children in pakistan

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Near East Refugee Aid; the most unlike its peers is Montgomery County Muslim Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UKAA ENDOWMENT FUND: $25,000 · OtherUKAA ENDOWMENT FUNDCENTRE FOR DIALOGUE PEACE AND ACTION: $17,500 · OtherCENTRE FOR DIALOGUE PEACE AND ACTIONAMERICAN MUSLIM INSTITUTE: $12,200 · OtherAMERICAN MUSLIM INSTITUTECENTRE FOR DIALOUGE PEACE AND ACTION: $7,500 · OtherCENTRE FOR DIALOUGE PEACE AND ACTIONIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDIL DEVELOPMENT IN LITERACY: $5,000 · OtherDIL DEVELOPMENT IN LITERACY+9 more: $8,600 · Other+9 moreINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE: $30,220 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSEEDU-GIRLS INC: $9,000 · InternationalEDU-GIRLS INC+1 more: $300 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI A: $3,000 · EducationDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC: $1,200 · EducationMONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND: $3,000 · Human ServicesGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,100 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $850 · HealthUP 2 US FOUNDATION: $800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$82,800International$39,520Education$4,200Human Services$3,000Arts & Culture$2,100Health$1,950Food & Nutrition$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE: $30,220 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI A: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUP 2 US FOUNDATION: $800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLAWRENCE SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI A ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UP 2 US FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haider Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haider Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haider’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home