Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Haider Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$73kCivil Rights$30kReligion$13kYouth Development$9kHuman Services$3kHealth$3kArts & Culture$2kFood & Nutrition$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE$6,250
UKAA ENDOWMENT FUND$6,000
CENTRE FOR DIALOUGE PEACE AND ACTIO$2,500
EDU GIRLS$2,000
WETA$400
MPT$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 14 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$111k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+106%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +14%
  • EI
    EDU-GIRLS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +132%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • DD
    DIL DEVELOPMENT IN LITERACY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI Agraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +116%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
2
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
3
Friends of the American University of Afghanistan

Friends of the american university of afghanistan (fauaf) is a 501(c)(3) public charity that advances higher education for afghan students by funding academic operations, scholarships, extracurricular activities, and bridge programming at…

International
4
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
6
United Nations International School

Under the auspices of the united nations and guided by its ideals, the united nations international school (unis) provides an inclusive and diverse learning environment in which rigorous international programs foster academic excellence,…

Education
7
Uswa Educational Association

Uswa educational association is committed to helping the poor and needy children, focused on pakistan. children's educational needs are helped through schools, such as the one established by jabir bin haya trust, islamabad, pakistan. this…

International
8
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
9
Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation

Asian university for women (auw) seeks to offer high quality education to young women of extraordinary talents drawn from diverse national, ethnic, religious, and socio-economic backgrounds. see schedule o for continuation.it is open to…

Education
10
The American University of Iraq Foundation Inc

To promote higher education in iraq based on the american liberal arts model.

Education
11
Ek Kadam Aur

Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.

International
12
Association of Pakistani Women in America Inc

Help disabled women and children in pakistan

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Near East Refugee Aid and the most unlike its peers is Montgomery County Muslim Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UKAA ENDOWMENT FUND — $25,000 · OtherUKAA ENDOWMENT FUNDCENTRE FOR DIALOGUE PEACE AND ACTION — $17,500 · OtherCENTRE FOR DIALOGUE PEACE AND ACTIONAMERICAN MUSLIM INSTITUTE — $12,200 · OtherAMERICAN MUSLIM INSTITUTECENTRE FOR DIALOUGE PEACE AND ACTION — $7,500 · OtherCENTRE FOR DIALOUGE PEACE AND ACTIONIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDIL DEVELOPMENT IN LITERACY — $5,000 · OtherDIL DEVELOPMENT IN LITERACY+9 more — $8,600 · Other+9 moreINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE — $30,220 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSEEDU-GIRLS INC — $9,000 · InternationalEDU-GIRLS INC+1 more — $300 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI A — $3,000 · EducationDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $1,200 · EducationMONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND — $3,000 · Human ServicesGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,100 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $850 · HealthUP 2 US FOUNDATION — $800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$82,800International$39,520Education$4,200Human Services$3,000Arts & Culture$2,100Health$1,950Food & Nutrition$800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE — $30,220 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND — $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI A — $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUP 2 US FOUNDATION — $800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLAWRENCE SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HOUSE
  • Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUSLIM FOUND
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI ALUMNI A
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds UP 2 US FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Haider Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph