Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Haggerty Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$54kHealth$52kHuman Services$45kEnvironment$41kEducation$40kFood & Nutrition$37kPhilanthropy$13kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUISE HOUSE$8,000
TODOS JUNTOS LEARNING CENTER$8,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER TX$6,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$5,000
FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES$5,000
LIFEWORKS OF AUSTIN$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
CASA MARIANELLA$4,000
WOMEN AND THEIR WORK$3,500
URBAN ROOTS$3,000
BAMBERGER RANCH PRESERVE$2,500
ALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION$2,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $2k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 9%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $2k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 30 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -81% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
5

Total granted

$299k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-81%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    Todos Juntos Learning Center
    4× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +196%
  • CO
    CARITAS OF AUSTIN
    4× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +19%
  • DOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • AR
    AUSTIN RECOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • BC
    BREAKTHROUGH CENTRAL TEXA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Coastal Prairie Conservancy

The Coastal Prairie Conservancy (CPC) works to sustain a resilient Texas by preserving coastal prairies, wetlands, farms, and ranches to benefit people and wildlife forever. Continued on Schedule OCPC conserves land, restores and enhances…

Environment
3
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
4
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
5
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
6
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
7
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
8
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
9
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
10
Austin Community Foundation Inc

We mobilize ideas and resources to strengthen central texas.

Philanthropy
11
Farm and City

Farm&City is an independent 501c3 think & do tank dedicated to high quality urban & rural human habitat in Texas in perpetuity. We improve public policies to improve millions of Texans lives in ways that preserve and enhance Texas land,…

Education
12
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Door County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bamberger Ranch Preserve. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUISE HOUSE: $28,000 · OtherST LOUISE HOUSECARITAS OF AUSTIN: $26,500 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTINLIFEWORKS OF AUSTIN: $13,250 · OtherLIFEWORKS OF AUSTINCASA MARIANELLA INC: $10,000 · OtherCASA MARIANELLA INCIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+22 more: $67,500 · Other+22 moreTodos Juntos Learning Center: $29,000 · EducationTodos Junto…BREAKTHROUGH: $3,500 · EducationBREAKTHROUG…AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentAUSTIN YOUT…DOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC: $25,500 · EnvironmentDOOR COUN…HILL COUNTRY CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $19,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,250 · HealthPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $1,000 · HealthAustin Clubhouse Inc: $1,000 · HealthBamberger Ranch Preserve: $10,500 · PhilanthropyThe Livestrong Foundation: $8,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $17,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$169,750Education$32,500Youth Development$31,500Environment$26,500Health$22,750Philanthropy$21,000Housing & Shelter$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $31,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTodos Juntos Learning Center: $29,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $26,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC: $25,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBamberger Ranch Preserve: $10,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCASA MARIANELLA INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $8,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $5,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIBRALTAR HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Women and Their Work Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA SCHOOL OF ART INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS ↗
  • Who funds Todos Juntos Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Bamberger Ranch Preserve ↗
  • Who funds CASA MARIANELLA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Livestrong Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIBRALTAR HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds Center for Women and Their Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA SCHOOL OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVATION AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Still Water Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · St David's Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Donald D Hammill Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · United Way for Greater Austin · The Moody Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haggerty Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haggerty Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Haggerty Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Haggerty Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haggerty Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph