Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Guardsmen

To be educational, philanthropic and civic, to the end that the members shall become more efficient in their homes, broader in their sympathies, and more forceful in raising the standard of civic morality, particularly as it appertains to standards of juvenile morality, and to promote civic activities which tend to combat juvenile…

$996k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$222k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$2.1MHuman Services$1.0MPhilanthropy$193kRecreation & Sports$124kInternational$44kEducation$38kHealth$37kReligion$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $504,498 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $995,973 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $491,475 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $292k
$14,265
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys & Girls Clubs of San SF$221,758
Catholic Charities CYO$70,000
Girl Scouts of Northern CA$27,500
Giants Community Fund$25,000
Golden Gate Area Boy Scouts$19,000
SOAR for Youth$15,345
The Okizu Foundation$15,000
Salvation Army-Golden State D$15,000
St Dorothys Rest$14,265
YMCA of San Francisco Camp J$14,000
The Bishops Ranch Camp$13,000
The Guardsmen & Okizu Fdtn$11,015
YMCA Camp Loma Mar$11,000
Camp Phoenix$7,200
Big City Mountaineers Inc$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $897k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YMCA of San Francisco Camp J: $14k → 7%AIM HIGH: $4k → 8%MIRACLE MESSAGES: $1k → 10%ROSE RESNICK LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 10%YMCA POINT BONITA: $2k → 8%Catholic Charities CYO: $95k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $95k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $93k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $76k → 9%Catholic Charities CYO: $70k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $61k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $60k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $45k → 9%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $54k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%YMCA of San Francisco: $50k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%YMCA Presidio: $14k → 10%YMCA PRESIDIO: $13k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $12k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $12k → 10%YMCA PRESIDIO: $8k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%GirlVentures: $9k → 10%GIRLVENTURES: $8k → 10%GIRLVENTURES: $8k → 10%GIRLVENTURES: $6k → 10%GIRLVENTURES: $5k → 10%GIRLVENTURES: $5k → 10%GIRLVENTURES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 28 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
16

Total granted

$3.6M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+10%

Still filing today

68%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +57%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $595k · revenue +60%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
    7× · 2017–2024 · $247k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TG
    The Guardsmen
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -26%
  • SB
    SAINT BRIGID SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • AH
    AIM HIGH
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scouts of California's Central Coast

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence & character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
2
San Francisco Junior Glens Soccer Association

To provide athletic opportunities to the youth of san francisco bay area by providing low cost opportunities to learn, play and participate in soccer by obtaining training in clinics, play and participate in leagues and tournaments.

Recreation & Sports
3
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

4
Boy Scouts of America 35 Marin Council

The marin council of the boy scouts of america, a california nonprofit public benefit corporation, is chartered by the boy scouts of america to promote the scouting program in marin county.

5
Santa Catalina School

Santa catalina school exists to develop in each student a striving for excellence, a maturing awareness of moral and spiritual values, a sense of responsible purpose, and a determination to serve the world with courage, grace, and…

Education
6
Boy Scouts of America 55 Silicon Valley Monterey Bay Council

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and scout law. scout oath: on my honor, i will do my best to do…

7
Pacific Skyline Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

8
University Camps

Unicamp student volunteers harness the healing power of the wilderness to provide a unique outdoor camping experience for at-risk children. through relationship-building, leadership and character development, and just plain fun, unicamp…

9
Redwood Empire Council Boy Scouts of America No41

The Mission of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law. The vision of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare…

10
Bay-Lakes Council #635 Boy Scouts of America

To instill in young people; values, develop leadership skills, and ethical character as expressed in the scout oath and law.

Youth Development
11
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

12
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports LeaguesFamily Crisis & Supportive …Social Innovation Infrastru…Performing Arts PresentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsYouth Development & Mentori…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr12%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr18%13%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr12%80%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/44
the rest of the field
15%
10,430/71,461

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,483,519 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCOGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $170,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIACAMP PHOENIX — $58,980 · Youth Development+2 more — $37,280 · Youth DevelopmentCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $594,810 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE …YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $246,949 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIAT…SOAR For Youth — $90,845 · Human ServicesSOAR For YouthGIRLVENTURES — $43,050 · Human Services+3 more — $11,768 · Human ServicesSAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COUNCIL BSA — $114,610 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO BAY …OKIZU FOUNDATION — $82,657 · OtherOKIZU FOUNDATIONYoung Men's Christian Association of the East Bay — $75,180 · OtherYoung Men's Christ…TODAYS YOUTH MATTER — $51,565 · OtherTODAYS YOUTH MATTE…EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA — $42,060 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH I…GOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023 — $37,945 · OtherGOLDEN GATE AREA C…The Salvation Army — $33,895 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyST DOROTHYS CHURCH — $32,550 · OtherST DOROTHYS CHURCHMISSION DOLORES ACADEMY — $30,567 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $27,960 · Other+16 more — $58,298 · Other+16 moreGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND — $212,579 · PhilanthropyGIRLS LEADING GIRLS — $29,831 · Recreation & SportsBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS — $29,283 · Recreation & SportsEPISCOPAL CAMPS AND CONFERENCE CENTERS INC — $23,280 · Recreation & SportsGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $675 · Recreation & SportsALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $25,325 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association — $3,536 · HealthGOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR — $9,005 · Arts & Culture
Youth Development$1,750,279Human Services$987,422Other$587,287Philanthropy$212,579Recreation & Sports$88,069Health$28,861Arts & Culture$9,005

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,483,519 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $594,810 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $246,949 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND — $212,579 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $170,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COUNCIL BSA — $114,610 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSOAR For Youth — $90,845 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION — $82,657 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the East Bay — $75,180 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP PHOENIX — $58,980 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetTODAYS YOUTH MATTER — $51,565 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetGIRLVENTURES — $43,050 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023 — $37,945 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Guardsmen — $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGIRLS LEADING GIRLS — $29,831 over 5y, 15% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS — $29,283 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $25,325 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL CAMPS AND CONFERENCE CENTERS INC — $23,280 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR — $9,005 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM — $7,280 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $6,720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $5,599 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEEDS OF AWARENESS — $4,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAIM HIGH — $3,960 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $3,536 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA COCINA — $1,115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JULIE FOUDY LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $749 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMISSION ASSET FUND — $721 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Unalayee Association — $675 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Spinsters of San Francisco — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COUNCIL BSA
  • Who funds SOAR For Youth
  • Who funds OKIZU FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the East Bay
  • Who funds CAMP PHOENIX
  • Who funds TODAYS YOUTH MATTER
  • Who funds GIRLVENTURES
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023
  • Who funds The Guardsmen
  • Who funds GIRLS LEADING GIRLS
  • Who funds BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS
  • Who funds ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL CAMPS AND CONFERENCE CENTERS INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE BOYS CHOIR
  • Who funds SEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED
  • Who funds AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds GOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEEDS OF AWARENESS
  • Who funds AIM HIGH
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association
  • Who funds OUTWARD BOUND INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds OLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LA COCINA
  • Who funds MIRACLE MESSAGES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA33.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Olympic Club Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Private Family Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The James Irvine Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · Janet and Clint Reilly Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Guardsmen funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph