Skip to content
The Gregory Marusak and Doria Anselmo Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Gregory Marusak and Doria Anselmo Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$50kEducation$40kYouth Development$13kCivil Rights$4kHealth$862Human Services$500Religion$300Philanthropy$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$368k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GO CAMPAIGN$9,330
WILDWOOD SCHOOL$5,493
LIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION$500
ST JUDE$300
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GO CAMPAIGN: $11k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $9k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $7k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $6k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $5k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $3k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $1k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $500 → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $500 → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $419 → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $300 → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $250 → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $200 → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $110 → 14%A SENSE OF HOME: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CA
UT
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 4 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$88k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $900 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    Go Campaign
    7× · 2018–2024 · $44k · revenue -37%
  • WS
    WILDWOOD SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +50%
  • OT
    OUTSIDE THE LENS
    4× · 2018–2022 · $12k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • WS
    WINDWARD SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +40%
  • NI
    NICARAGUA INITIATIVE FOR COMMUNITY ADVAN CEMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +50%
  • RAZOM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
2
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
3
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
12
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thousand Currents; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Go Campaign: $44,412 · Human ServicesGo Campaign+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesWILDWOOD SCHOOL INC: $30,215 · EducationWILDWOOD SCHOOL INCWINDWARD SCHOOL: $5,500 · EducationWINDWARD SCHOOL+1 more: $200 · EducationOUTSIDE THE LENS: $12,291 · Youth DevelopmentOUTSIDE THE LE…LIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION: $500 · Youth DevelopmentNICARAGUA INITIATIVE FOR COMMUNITY ADVAN CEMENT INC: $3,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $1,030 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $511 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $250 · InternationalST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $762 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOME: $500 · OtherST JUDE: $300 · OtherNETWORK FOR GOOD: $200 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 · OtherHumane World for Animals Inc: $100 · Other+1 more: $53 · OtherTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $210 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $200 · Civil RightsTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $200 · Environment
Human Services$44,912Education$35,915Youth Development$12,791International$5,291Other$2,015Civil Rights$410Environment$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGo Campaign: $44,412 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWILDWOOD SCHOOL INC: $30,215 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOUTSIDE THE LENS: $12,291 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWINDWARD SCHOOL: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICARAGUA INITIATIVE FOR COMMUNITY ADVAN CEMENT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRAZOM INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA SENSE OF HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHTECH LA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gregory Marusak and Doria Anselmo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gregory Marusak and Doria Anselmo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregory Marusak and Doria Anselmo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home