Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
9
Organizations funded FY2019
22%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $66k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
9
’18
8
’19
1
’22
0
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$35,395
Organizations funded a year
7 to 10
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$1.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 22% of the organizations The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20199$66k22%
FY201810$148k50%
FY20177$92kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$236kPhilanthropy$175kEnvironment$50kHousing & Shelter$22kRecreation & Sports$4kHealth$3kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$750Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Benedictine Fathers of the Priory$125,0703n/a
Williams College$80,00020%
Yosemite Foundation$50,00040%
Rocketship Education$30,00030%
Lifemoves$20,00010%
Bay Area Womens Sports Initiative$2,50010%
Safe & Sound$1,50020%
Compass Family Services$1,50020%
Olympic Club Foundation$1,00020%
Society of Young Inklings Inc$50010%
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Benedictine Fathers of the Priory$125,0703n/a
Williams College$80,00020%
Yosemite Foundation$50,00040%
Rocketship Education$30,00030%
Lifemoves$20,00010%
Bay Area Womens Sports Initiative$2,50010%
Safe & Sound$1,50020%
Compass Family Services$1,50020%
Olympic Club Foundation$1,00020%
Society of Young Inklings Inc$50010%
Coachartorg$50010%
The Fit Kids Foundation Inc$2501n/a

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($3k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWilliams College: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYosemite Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRocketship Education: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLifemoves: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSafe & Sound: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCompass Family Services: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOlympic Club Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSociety of Young Inklings Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCoachartorg: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation

How much does The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation give?
The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $65,895 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Education (48%), Philanthropy (36%), Environment (10%).
Who are The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Benedictine Fathers of the Priory ($125k), Williams College ($80k), Yosemite Foundation ($50k).
Does The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 22% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, The Sobrato Family Foundation.
Where is The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation based?
The Greg and Lisa Stanger Charitable Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greg and Lisa Stanger’s filings →

More from the funding graph