Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Greenwall Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Education$11MHealth$6.3MScience & Tech$712kSocial Science$609kPhilanthropy$272kRecreation & Sports$227kCrime & Legal$40kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $2.0M
$49,976
Median grant
13
States reached
$114M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW VENTURE FUND$150,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$81,322
UNIVERISTY OF VIRGINIA$77,100
DUKE UNIVERSITY$74,053
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$73,047
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$69,582
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$67,002
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$64,646
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER$63,794
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL$63,653
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$60,602
BOSTON COLLEGE$58,727
BOSTON COLLEGE$58,727
U OF CHICAGO$57,508
U OF CHICAGO$57,508
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOSTON COLLEGE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK: $121k → 7%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $178k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN: $122k → 13%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $255k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY: $109k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $115k → 14%THE HASTINGS CENTER: $126k → 6%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $169k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $300k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $137k → 10%THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $130k → 17%YALE UNIVERSITY: $190k → 12%DUKE LAW SCHOOL: $197k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $162k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $143k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER ANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS: $148k → 10%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $168k → 18%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $123k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $106k → 9%ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $126k → 10%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 14%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $152k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $155k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN: $122k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $135k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY DEPT OF HEALTH RESEARCH & POLICY: $130k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY: $107k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $124k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $140k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $119k → 10%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $111k → 17%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $110k → 14%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $148k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $167k → 19%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $136k → 21%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $110k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS BERMAN INSTITUTE OF BIOETHICS: $121k → 19%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $127k → 21%LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $102k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $116k → 19%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $120k → 21%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100k → 19%NEW VENTURE FUND: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $124k → 14%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY: $121k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $182k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of The Greenwall Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Greenwall Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 42 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
43

Total granted

$12M
$3.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+34%

Still filing today

60%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +42%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    6× · 2019–2024 · $634k · revenue +47%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $487k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +7%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $190k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $178k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is The Center for Environmental Transformation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%53%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%69%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/64
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
46/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $1,047,958 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $471,524 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $449,693 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $424,296 · OtherThe Hastings Center Inc — $390,836 · OtherU PENN — $318,225 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER ANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS — $304,469 · Other+56 more — $5,517,465 · Other+56 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,496,019 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,294,009 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIABaylor College of Medicine — $634,148 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $515,701 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUN…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $487,287 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $431,368 · EducationNew York University — $372,356 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $336,771 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $300,215 · Education+18 more — $2,362,903 · Education+18 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $241,411 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $239,582 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $219,685 · HealthALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $194,768 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation — $177,679 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $55,096 · Health+1 more — $25,000 · HealthNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $342,500 · Science & TechNorthwestern University — $226,192 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY — $215,945 · Community ImprovementTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY — $10,000 · Community ImprovementNEW VENTURE FUND — $150,000 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSFORMATION INC — $7,500 · Environment
Other$8,924,466Education$8,230,777Health$1,153,221Science & Tech$342,500Recreation & Sports$227,192Community Improvement$225,945Environment$157,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,496,019 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,294,009 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $634,148 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $515,701 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $487,287 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $431,368 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hastings Center Inc — $390,836 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetNew York University — $372,356 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $342,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $336,771 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $300,215 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $272,056 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $262,661 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $241,411 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $239,582 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $234,404 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $226,192 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $219,685 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $215,945 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $215,216 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $202,675 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $197,441 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $194,768 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $192,254 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $177,679 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $171,809 over 1y, 65% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $163,647 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $142,653 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $123,862 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $117,454 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $104,201 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $100,802 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $96,012 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $87,503 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $59,251 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $55,096 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $49,974 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $46,551 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANDID — $37,507 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc — $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDavidson College — $36,165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITAL TALK — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSupport Center for Child Advocates — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Hastings Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Greenwall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Greenwall Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Greenwall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines