Skip to content
The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC at a glance

· Private foundation

The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$848k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$2.9MEducation$1.7MArts & Culture$1.6MHealth$242kYouth Development$230kFood & Nutrition$141kHuman Services$135kHousing & Shelter$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $354k
  • $250k+1 grant · $410k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$410,000
HERMITAGE ARTIST RETREAT INC$175,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$99,000
UPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FND$80,000
FRESH ARTISTS$25,000
PHILLY UNKNOWN PROJECT$20,000
FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC$15,000
ARTWELL$12,000
FULFILLMENT FUND$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $388k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20k → 14%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE: $35k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $30k → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 14%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE: $35k → 10%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $15k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $10k → 17%FULFILLMENT FUND: $60k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $31k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $12k → 14%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $30k → 22%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $10k → 22%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $30k → 22%WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $10k → 22%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND - PA: $10k → 22%WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 45% of The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 24%.

The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 23 repeat orgs$627k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
28

Total granted

$3.7M
$570k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+6%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +132% · 28% of their budget
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    6× · 2017–2025 · $459k · revenue +5%
  • FF
    FULFILLMENT FUND
    4× · 2021–2025 · $118k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RI
    RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CANCER C
    one grant, 2019 · $62k
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
6
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
7
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
8
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
9
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Urban League of Greater Philadelphia

The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Library of Philadelphia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
29/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,907,463 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeUPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $860,025 · EducationUPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATIONTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $459,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education+6 more: $246,000 · Education+6 moreHermitage Artist Retreat Inc: $1,387,000 · Arts & CultureHermitage Artist Retreat…FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreRESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CANCER C: $61,839 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $41,000 · OtherWCRP: $40,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH: $35,550 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherBUILD A BRIDGE: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $25,000 · OtherHEALTHLY START COALITION OF SARASOT: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO MOVE LA: $20,000 · OtherPHILLY UNKNOWN PROJECT: $20,000 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC: $50,000 · OtherALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · OtherLA COCINA: $30,000 · Other+8 more: $68,500 · OtherFULFILLMENT FUND: $117,810 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $30,000 · Human ServicesABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $30,000 · Human ServicesAT THE CROSSROADS: $30,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesTemple University Hospital Inc: $90,000 · HealthKELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND: $20,000 · HealthInterim House Inc: $15,000 · HealthESOPHAGEAL CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · HealthALSO FOR GAY YOUTH INC: $99,190 · Civil Rights412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD TRUST: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$4,472,488Arts & Culture$1,547,000Other$571,889Human Services$387,810Health$130,000Civil Rights$99,190Food & Nutrition$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,907,463 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHermitage Artist Retreat Inc: $1,387,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetUPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $860,025 over 9y, 41% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $459,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $117,810 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetALSO FOR GAY YOUTH INC: $99,190 over 2y, 14% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $74,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC: $70,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetUPCHIEVE INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAT THE CROSSROADS: $30,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLA COCINA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH ARTISTS: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE FOOD TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInterim House Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ART OF ELYSIUM: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHuman-I-T: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASH ON TRACK: $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetArtwell Collaborative Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSATCHELS LAST RESORT: $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAZZONI CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SITUATION PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetESOPHAGEAL CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOLEBURY SCHOOL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…Henrietta Tower Wurts…Claneil Foundation IncHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…United Way of Greater…Adam and Maria Sarah …Union Benevolent Asso…Lindback Cr & Mf Foun…Chubb Charitable Foun…Ludwick FdnIndependence Foundati…
The William Penn FoundationPA22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Claneil Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls · Union Benevolent Association · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Ludwick Fdn · Independence Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home