Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$848k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Science & Tech$2.9MEducation$1.7MArts & Culture$1.6MHealth$242kYouth Development$230kFood & Nutrition$141kHuman Services$135kHousing & Shelter$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $354k
  • $250k+1 grant · $410k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$410,000
HERMITAGE ARTIST RETREAT INC$175,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$99,000
UPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FND$80,000
FRESH ARTISTS$25,000
PHILLY UNKNOWN PROJECT$20,000
FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC$15,000
FULFILLMENT FUND$12,000
ARTWELL$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $388k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20k → 14%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE: $35k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $30k → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 14%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE: $35k → 10%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $15k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $10k → 17%FULFILLMENT FUND: $60k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $31k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $12k → 14%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $30k → 22%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $10k → 22%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $30k → 22%WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $10k → 22%WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $10k → 22%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND - PA: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 45% of The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 24% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 23 repeat orgs$627k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
28

Total granted

$3.7M
$570k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+6%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +132% · 28% of their budget
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    6× · 2017–2025 · $459k · revenue +5%
  • FF
    FULFILLMENT FUND
    4× · 2021–2025 · $118k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RI
    RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CANCER C
    one grant, 2019 · $62k
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
6
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
7
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
8
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
9
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Urban League of Greater Philadelphia

The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Library of Philadelphia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtq+ Community CentersEducation Equity LeadershipCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Public Library SupportCommunity Arts OrganizationsUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Pregnancy Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentFood Pantries & AssistancePublic School District Foun…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%50%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,521

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
30/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College — $2,907,463 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeUPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $860,025 · EducationUPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATIONTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $459,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education+6 more — $246,000 · Education+6 moreHermitage Artist Retreat Inc — $1,387,000 · Arts & CultureHermitage Artist Retreat…FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreRESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CANCER C — $61,839 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $41,000 · OtherWCRP — $40,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH — $35,550 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $35,000 · OtherBUILD A BRIDGE — $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherHEALTHLY START COALITION OF SARASOT — $25,000 · OtherURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO MOVE LA — $20,000 · OtherPHILLY UNKNOWN PROJECT — $20,000 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC — $50,000 · OtherALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · OtherLA COCINA — $30,000 · Other+8 more — $68,500 · OtherFULFILLMENT FUND — $117,810 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES — $30,000 · Human ServicesAT THE CROSSROADS — $30,000 · Human ServicesABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA — $30,000 · Human ServicesTemple University Hospital Inc — $90,000 · HealthKELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND — $20,000 · HealthInterim House Inc — $15,000 · HealthESOPHAGEAL CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · HealthALSO FOR GAY YOUTH INC — $99,190 · Civil Rights412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD TRUST — $20,000 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$4,472,488Arts & Culture$1,547,000Other$571,889Human Services$387,810Health$130,000Civil Rights$99,190Food & Nutrition$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $2,907,463 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHermitage Artist Retreat Inc — $1,387,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetUPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $860,025 over 9y, 41% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $459,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND — $117,810 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetALSO FOR GAY YOUTH INC — $99,190 over 2y, 14% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $74,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF MANATEE INC — $70,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetUPCHIEVE INC — $65,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN JOURNALISM PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLA COCINA — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES — $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAT THE CROSSROADS — $30,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH ARTISTS — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKELLY ANNE DOLAN MEMORIAL FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE FOOD TRUST — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ART OF ELYSIUM — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetInterim House Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHuman-I-T — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASH ON TRACK — $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArtwell Collaborative Inc — $12,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSATCHELS LAST RESORT — $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SITUATION PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetESOPHAGEAL CANCER AWARENESS ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAZZONI CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLEBURY SCHOOL — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…The Philadelphia Foun…Henrietta Tower Wurts…Claneil Foundation IncHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…United Way of Greater…Adam and Maria Sarah …Union Benevolent Asso…Lindback Cr & Mf Foun…Chubb Charitable Foun…Ludwick FdnIndependence Foundati…
The William Penn FoundationPA22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Claneil Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls · Union Benevolent Association · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Ludwick Fdn · Independence Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Greenfield Foundation Inc Co Harp-Weaver LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines