Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Greater Clark Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$572k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.4MCommunity Improvement$658kPhilanthropy$236kArts & Culture$173kHealth$153kEducation$145kPublic Benefit$136kRecreation & Sports$89kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $520k
$5,900
Median grant
6
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- FBO LEGACY GREENSCAPES$220,000
CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$100,000
BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- FBO LEGACY GREENSCAPES$100,000
BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- FBO LEGACY GREENSCAPES$100,000
CLARK COUNTY EQUITY COALITION$20,000
THE HARWOOD INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC INNOVATION$10,000
PHILANTHROPY SOUTHEAST$5,900
KENTUCKY NONPROFIT NETWORK INC$5,000
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$5,000
GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH$3,325
PEAK GRANTMAKING$1,000
PACE - PHILANTHROPY FOR ACTIVE CIVIC ENGAGEMENT$1,000
APPALACHIA FUNDERS NETWORK$550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM: $15k → 15%NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM: $5k → 15%CLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 15%CLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 15%CLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 15%CLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OH
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 24 repeat orgs$523k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +102% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
44

Total granted

$3.5M
$403k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+47%

Still filing today

54%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $58k · revenue +111%
  • WC
    WINCHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTSINC DBA LEEDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS
    4× · 2018–2021 · $52k · revenue +267%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES IN
    3× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • BG
    BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION-FBO CLARK CNTY EQ COALITION AND PROUDTOWN
    one grant, 2024 · $45k
  • IW
    I WAS HERE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +209% · 30% of their budget
  • WM
    WINCHETER MINORITY LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE CLARK COUNTY COMUNITY FOUNDADTION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
2
Kentucky Resources Council Inc

Kentucky resources council (krc) is a public-interest environmental law and advocacy organization that works to protect and defend the people, communities, and natural resources of kentucky. krc uses legal and strategic advocacy to protect…

Environment
3
Appalachian Investment Corporation

Appalachian investment corporation works to increase economic activity in the appalachian counties of kentucky.

—
4
Kentucky Highlands Investment Corp

Khic's purpose is to plan, promote, initiate, and coordinate community, economic, and social development efforts. khic has used a venture capital approach yielding notable positive results. it has a strong base of capital with a portfolio…

—
5
Invest Appalachia Inc

Invest appalachia (ia) is a regional impact investment platform designed by and for the people of central appalachia. ia provides blended investment capital to strengthen business opportunities, build equitable local wealth, advance…

Environment
6
Kentucky Coalition Inc

To support grassroots organizing, leadership development & public education around important public policy. ky coalition seeks to promote active citizen participation in the democratic process.

Public Benefit
7
Middle Kentucky Community Action Partnership Inc

To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.

—
8
Kentucky Conference for Community & Justice Inc

Provide support and services to strenthen, support, and grow the capacity of local central kentucky nonprofits.

Crime & Legal
9
Leadership Kentucky Foundation Inc

Broadens the perspectives of current and emerging leaders through experiential education that inspires them to advance kentucky.

Public Benefit
10
Kentucky Public Radio Inc

Lpm provides independent and courageous news, music and experiences that serve the needs and aspirations of our diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
11
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

—
12
Art Opportunities Inc

To create community driven public art and launch careers for youth and artists.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peak Grantmaking Inc; the most unlike its peers is Beacon of Hope Emergency Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $841,875 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION-FBO LEGACY GREENSCAPES: $682,500 · OtherBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION-FBO LEGACY GREENSCAPESCity of Winchester: $176,030 · OtherCity of WinchesterTHE HARWOOD INSTITUTE: $144,877 · OtherTHE HARWOOD INSTITUTECLARK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100,000 · OtherPROGRESS LEX INC DBA CIVICLEX: $87,000 · Other+48 more: $492,298 · Other+48 moreLEGACY GREENSCAPES INC: $717,108 · EnvironmentLEGACY GREENSCAPES …+1 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentTHE HARWOOD INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC INNOVATION: $416,700 · Community ImprovementTHE HARWOOD …ESTILL COUNTY 21ST CENTURY INC: $20,500 · Community Improvement+2 more: $7,913 · Community ImprovementBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $67,500 · PhilanthropyPhilanthropy Southeast Inc: $44,588 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION: $31,000 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $19,460 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyWINCHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTSINC DBA LEEDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $52,157 · Arts & CultureI WAS HERE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLEXARTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAPPALSHOP INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES IN: $45,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC: $57,500 · Health
Other$2,524,580Environment$718,358Community Improvement$445,113Philanthropy$175,548Arts & Culture$108,157Human Services$65,500Health$57,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGACY GREENSCAPES INC: $717,108 over 5y, 86% of budgetTHE HARWOOD INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC INNOVATION: $416,700 over 7y, 15% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $67,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC: $57,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINCHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTSINC DBA LEEDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $52,157 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES IN: $45,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPhilanthropy Southeast Inc: $44,588 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVING RECOVERY TOGETHER INC: $27,433 over 3y, 10% of budgetKENTUCKY NONPROFIT NETWORK INC: $25,100 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetI WAS HERE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetLEXARTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCLARK COUNTY EQUITY COALITION CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $19,460 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC: $19,250 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetRED OAKS CENTER FOR NATURE AND THE ARTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MADISON AND CLARK COUNTIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOCUS IMPACT INVESTING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAPPALSHOP INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPEAK GRANTMAKING INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY RIVER FOOTHILLS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $413 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGACY GREENSCAPES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARWOOD INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTSINC DBA LEEDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES IN ↗
  • Who funds Philanthropy Southeast Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVING RECOVERY TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY NONPROFIT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds I WAS HERE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTILL COUNTY 21ST CENTURY INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY EQUITY COALITION CORP ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds RED OAKS CENTER FOR NATURE AND THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MADISON AND CLARK COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds LOCUS IMPACT INVESTING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY39.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · John N Browning Family Fdcarlisle Co US · E&W G Foundation · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Tc Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greater Clark Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greater Clark Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Clark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph