· Private foundation
The Gordon Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $31,250 |
| OLE HEALTH | $18,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM | $18,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY IN NEVADA | $8,500 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA | $8,000 |
| JEWISH NEVADA | $5,250 |
| ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| TYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS | $5,000 |
| NELLIS SUPPORT TEAM | $4,500 |
| THE UCLA FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| GIVE MENTOR LOVE FDN | $2,500 |
| NEVADA CENTER FOR HUMANITY | $2,500 |
| USHMM | $2,000 |
| TRINI FOUNDATION | $1,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +11%
- TJTHE JUST ONE PROJECT3× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +84%
- ICISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL3× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- TSTHE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +64%
- TFTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLEone grant, 2024 · $6k
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…
Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.
Our mission is to help and heal children and their families who have been traumatized by abuse and neglect. because every child deserves a voice, we provide vital services when they need it the most.
Offering hope, help and healing to those affected by sexual violence and exploitation. making an impact in the core services of: prevention, education, advocacy and counseling.
Women's resource medical centers of southern nevada (wrmcsn) is a community-based, faith-driven not for profit 501 (c) 3 organization that exists to support pregnant women with medical care and resources to ensure healthy and thriving…
The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.
Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, nevada was established in 1990. habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred…
Bikur cholim organizes and subsidizes medical treatment, speech and physical therapy, medication, durable medical equipment, blood products, homecare, transportation, housing for patients and family-members, meals, and diagnostics while…
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…
New vista is committed to providing people of all ages with intellectual and developmental disabilities, equitable opportunities, and supported living arrangements so that they may experience life to the fullest.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Barkmerica. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 35% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
- Who funds TYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE JUST ONE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE SHAQUILLE O'NEAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds CHASE RAUCHLE PTSD NOW ↗
- Who funds Theta Phi Lambda Foundation ↗
- Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds TRINI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Yoga Haven ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOVA INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NELLIS SUPPORT TEAM ↗
- Who funds KLOTHES 4 KIDS ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Shuster Family Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Mondays Dark · Engelstad Family Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · Canarelli Family Foundation · Three Square · The Boyd Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Gordon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Period Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.