Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gloria & Ken Levy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$1.8MInternational$1.2MEducation$1.1MReligion$1.1MPhilanthropy$270kHuman Services$256kArts & Culture$81kRecreation & Sports$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $434k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$500,000
FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE$250,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATIO$150,000
CHABAD OF HAMILTON HEIGHTS INC$114,000
THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR E$100,000
JEWISH SILICON VALLEY$70,092
CONGREGATION BETH DAVID$29,752
SILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL$10,000
BIKE NEW YORK INC$10,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$9,100
AMERICA GIVES INC$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$2,500
ARLEKIN PLAYERS THEATRE$2,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$2,000
ARTS EXPRESS THEATRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $254k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $84k → 8%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50k → 15%JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $70k → 8%JEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 18 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
23

Total granted

$3.6M
$872k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+20%

Still filing today

61%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $590k · revenue +55%
  • SV
    SILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +5%
  • TK
    THE KEHILLAH SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2021 · $16k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION - ISR
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL NATI
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWNgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bike New York Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH DAVID: $639,190 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH DAVIDAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION - ISR: $500,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION - ISRCHABAD OF CCNYHAMILTON HEIGHTS: $288,050 · OtherCHABAD OF CCNYHAMILTON HEIGHTSTHE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR E: $265,000 · OtherTHE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR ETHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL NATI: $250,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL NATICHABAD OF HAMILTON HEIGHTS INC: $114,000 · Other+25 more: $123,205 · Other+25 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL …AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION …+1 more: $500 · InternationalUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $590,000 · EducationUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDAT…THE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE: $500,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR CI…+4 more: $18,910 · EducationLevy Family Campus: $260,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,700 · PhilanthropyJEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $203,852 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50,000 · Human ServicesSILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $75,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $3,250 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,500 · Recreation & SportsBike New York Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,179,445International$1,900,500Education$1,108,910Philanthropy$262,700Human Services$253,852Arts & Culture$78,250Recreation & Sports$20,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $900,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $590,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE: $500,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLevy Family Campus: $260,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH SILICON VALLEY: $203,852 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $75,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE KEHILLAH SCHOOL: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD RUNNERS: $10,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVEKIDS: $2,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARLEKIN PLAYERS THEATRE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAM'S PALS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA ENDOWMENT: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Levy Family Campus ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds THE KEHILLAH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bike New York Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RUNNERS ↗
  • Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Rogosin Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEKIDS ↗
  • Who funds ARLEKIN PLAYERS THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD COAST MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAM'S PALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Altman-Aronow Charitable Foundation · Taube Foundation for Jewish Life and Culture · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gloria & Ken Levy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gloria & Ken Levy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gloria & Ken Levy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gloria & Ken Levy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gloria & Ken Levy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph