Skip to content
The Glockner Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Glockner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$372k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$949kEducation$354kCommunity Improvement$245kHuman Services$229kArts & Culture$89kYouth Development$33kPhilanthropy$27kRecreation & Sports$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
$8,334
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$200,000
MARKET SQUARE PARK$100,000
ST JOHN PAUL II SCIOTO CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
NOTRE DAME SCHOOLS$11,000
LAWERENCE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$8,334
BONEYFIDDLE PROJECT$8,000
TIME OUT FOR ME INC$4,000
FRIENDS OF GREENLAWN CEMETERY FOUNDATION$2,500
MARY'S CLOTHESLINE INC$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 22%HILL VIEW RETIREMENT CENTER: $5k → 22%HILLS VIEW RETIREMENT CENTER: $3k → 22%LIVING WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 29 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
35

Total granted

$2.2M
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+20%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Market Square Park LLC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $250k · revenue +314% · 93% of their budget
  • WO
    WINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +27% · 27% of their budget
  • BP
    BONEYFIDDLE PROJECT
    6× · 2018–2025 · $58k · revenue +83% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • CO
    CITY OF PORTSMOUTH
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Revive Ohio Mobile Outreach Inc

Missionary Outreach

Religion
2
Columbus Historic Preservation Trust

Preservation, Display and use of Historic buildings

Unclassified
3
Graysville & Community Vol Fire Dept

Providing rural fire protection services for the village of Graysville, OH and surrounding community

—
4
Historical Society of Greenfield Ohio Inc
Arts & Culture
5
The Portsmouth Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and business opportunities in the portsmouth, ohio area

—
6
Historic Southwest Ohio Inc

Historical education programs.

Arts & Culture
7
Olde Towne Nipomo Association Inc

Revitalization of downtown olde nipmo.

Community Improvement
8
Mansfield Reformatory Preservation Society

Preservation and restoration of old prison

Arts & Culture
9
Southern Ohio Community Concert Ass Dba Southern Ohio Performing Arts a

To provide quality entertainment to the residents of portsmouth and the surrounding area

—
10
Port Main Street Inc

Promotion of and betterment of the community

Community Improvement
11
Meigs County Community Improvement

Industrial developement for meigs county, ohio

Community Improvement
12
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Foundation Inc

Dedicated to supporting the mission of the muskingum watershed conservancy district by providing financial resources that enhance facilities, programs, and conservation efforts on or adjacent to district lands and waters.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hill View Retirement Center; the most unlike its peers is Market Square Park Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $600,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATIONST MARYS CHURCH: $251,000 · OtherST MARYS CHURCHMarket Square Park LLC: $250,000 · OtherMarket Square Park LLCNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $214,730 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOLJESUIT SPIRITUAL CENTER: $120,000 · OtherJESUIT SPIRITUAL CENTERST FRANCIS OUTREACH CENTER: $110,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOLS: $78,500 · Other+48 more: $496,577 · Other+48 moreWINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES: $134,609 · HealthBONEYFIDDLE PROJECT: $58,499 · Arts & CulturePORTSMOUTH MURALS INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureMAIN STREET PORTSMOUTH: $7,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of Southern Ohio: $37,700 · Community ImprovementHILLTOP INITIATIVE NEIGHBORHOOD: $6,000 · Community ImprovementGrowing Lucasville Opportunities Inc: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHILL VIEW RETIREMENT CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesLIVING WITH A CAUSE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSTEVEN A HUNTER HOPE FUND INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE SCIOTO COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,120,807Health$134,609Arts & Culture$88,499Community Improvement$48,700Human Services$18,500Education$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarket Square Park LLC: $250,000 over 3y, 93% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES: $134,609 over 7y, 27% of budgetBONEYFIDDLE PROJECT: $58,499 over 6y, 31% of budgetFriends of Southern Ohio: $37,700 over 3y, 11% of budget14TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $34,267 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetPORTSMOUTH MURALS INC: $23,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican Legion Post 23: $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SCIOTO COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHAWNEE BOATING CLUB: $7,785 over 1y, 26% of budgetHILL VIEW RETIREMENT CENTER: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET PORTSMOUTH: $7,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetHILLTOP INITIATIVE NEIGHBORHOOD: $6,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF GREENLAWN CEMETERY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetGrowing Lucasville Opportunities Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFreedom Waters Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWatch Me Grow Ohio: $1,600 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetLIVING WITH A CAUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Market Square Park LLC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds BONEYFIDDLE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Southern Ohio ↗
  • Who funds 14TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PORTSMOUTH MURALS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEVEN A HUNTER HOPE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American Legion Post 23 ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCIOTO COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHAWNEE BOATING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HILL VIEW RETIREMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET PORTSMOUTH ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOP INITIATIVE NEIGHBORHOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Scioto County Are…Southern Ohio Medical…Richard D Marting Fou…Peoples Bank Foundati…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Scioto County Area FoundationOH32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Scioto County Area Foundation · Southern Ohio Medical Center · Richard D Marting Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Glockner Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Glockner Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glockner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home