· Private foundation
The Glockner Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $333k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| MARKET SQUARE PARK | $75,000 |
| NOTRE DAME SCHOOLS | $57,500 |
| ST MARYS CHURCH | $26,000 |
| BOTTOMS UP DIAPER BANK | $15,000 |
| BONEYFIDDLE PROJECT | $10,000 |
| LAWERENCE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $8,333 |
| WHEELERSBURG SCHOOLS ALUMNI & FRIENDS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SSU DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES | $5,000 |
| TIME OUT FOR ME INC | $4,000 |
| FRIENDS OF GREENLAWN CEMETERY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| MAYO'S CLOTHESLINE INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMarket Square Park LLC2× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +314% · 93% of their budget
- WOWINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES7× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +27% · 27% of their budget
- BPBONEYFIDDLE PROJECT5× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +83% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $21k
- COCITY OF PORTSMOUTHone grant, 2017 · $20k
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preservation, Display and use of Historic buildings
Missionary Outreach
To promote business and business opportunities in the portsmouth, ohio area
Providing rural fire protection services for the village of Graysville, OH and surrounding community
Historical education programs.
Revitalization of downtown olde nipmo.
Preservation and restoration of old prison
To provide quality entertainment to the residents of portsmouth and the surrounding area
Promotion of and betterment of the community
To aid in the economic development, revitalization, and elimination of blight in the city of springfield and the city's core downtown area.
Industrial developement for meigs county, ohio
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hill View Retirement Center and the most unlike its peers is Market Square Park Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Market Square Park LLC ↗
- Who funds WINGS OF HOPE RECOVERY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds BONEYFIDDLE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Friends of Southern Ohio ↗
- Who funds 14TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PORTSMOUTH MURALS INC ↗
- Who funds STEVEN A HUNTER HOPE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCIOTO COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds American Legion Post 23 ↗
- Who funds SHAWNEE BOATING CLUB ↗
- Who funds HILL VIEW RETIREMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET PORTSMOUTH ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP INITIATIVE NEIGHBORHOOD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Scioto County Area Foundation · Southern Ohio Medical Center · Richard D Marting Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Glockner Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.