Skip to content

· Public charity

The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc

The organization is operated for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and to carry out the purposes of its supported organizations.

$294k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$856kEducation$853kInternational$720kFood & Nutrition$444kHousing & Shelter$368kEnvironment$57kYouth Development$51k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $276,009, the rows itemized in this filing. The $293,945 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,936 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
$32,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND$65,700
OTHER DOMESTIC PROJECTS$65,432
UCF FOUNDATION$38,607
ELEVATION SCHOLARS$32,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$25,300
EVERY KIDS OUTREACH$25,000
4ROOTS$13,470
ELEVATE ORLANDO$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $477k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELEVATION: $85k → 13%ELEVATION: $72k → 13%ELEVATION: $55k → 13%ELEVATION: $51k → 13%ELEVATION: $50k → 13%ELEVATION: $50k → 13%ELEVATION: $50k → 13%ELEVATION SCHOLARS: $33k → 13%ELEVATION SCHOLARS: $32k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$3.3M
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $477k · revenue +78%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +52%
  • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $336k · revenue +49%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Foundation for Rural Education Excellence Inc

    To help ensure the achievement of academic excellence and career opportunities for rural students in north east florida.

    Education
    2
    Harvesting 4 Haiti Foundation

    Help haitian agriculture initiatives become self-sustaining by providing financial & business assistance, thereby reducing poverty through long-term development.

    International
    3
    University of Florida Leadership and Education Foundation Inc

    The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of the university of florida. more specifically, the foundation is organized to…

    Public Benefit
    4
    Followers of Christ

    Followers of Christ, Inc. is a Haitian-run nonprofit organization based in Florida serving the people of Haiti through Christian ministries and mission work.

    Religion
    5
    Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc

    Florida certified organic growers and consumers, inc. (fog) supports and promotes organic, regenerative, and sustainable agriculture.

    Food & Nutrition
    6
    Florida Food Force Inc

    To fight hunger through united forces/partnerships; provide nutritional food products that will nurture, sustain and enhance quality of life; facility, contribute and promote programs for hunger relief, strengthening our communities.

    Food & Nutrition
    7
    Florida Opportunity Fund Inc

    The fund was created because the florida legislature found there was a need to increase the availability of seed capital and early stage venture equity capital for emerging companies in the state, including, without limitation, enterprises…

    Community Improvement
    8
    Roots Africa Inc

    ROOTS Africa is a non-profit venture whose mission is to combat hunger and poverty in Africa by connecting academic institutions and experts in the US to farming communities in Africa. We have a vision to connect the world by engaging…

    International
    9
    Haitian Roots

    Haitian Roots provides educational scholarships to disadvantaged children as well as providing for the needs of young orphans living in an urban orphanage. Haitian Roots is also continuously working towards building their own school on a…

    Education
    10
    Florida Future Farmers of America Inc

    The Florida FFA Association is a premier youth, leadership organization with over 65,000 middle and high school student members as part of over 300 local FFA chapters across the state. FFA members participate in nearly 50 leadership and…

    —
    11
    Equipping Farmers International

    EFI's mission is to cultivate agricultural discipleship worldwide for enhanced food security and livelihoods, envisioning a network of churches eradicating hunger and insecurity globally.

    International
    12
    Secure Florida's Future Inc

    Secure florida's future's primary exempt purpose is to educate the citizens of florida about economic competitiveness and job growth opportunities to secure florida's future.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Leadership Venture; the most unlike its peers is Thousand Hills Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/10
    Grantees still filing
    7/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Every Kid Outreach Inc: $693,313 · OtherEvery Kid Outreach IncOTHER DOMESTIC PROJECTS: $367,916 · OtherOTHER DOMESTIC PROJECTSSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $335,761 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC+1 more: $33,000 · OtherTHE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC: $699,656 · InternationalTHE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE F…ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $477,157 · Human ServicesELEVATION SCHOLA…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $375,362 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…FLORIDA FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $129,890 · Philanthropy4ROOTS FOUNDATION INC: $108,470 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR INT'L REFORESTATION: $57,442 · EnvironmentFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE: $50,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHOUSAND HILLS MINISTRY INC: $20,000 · Religion
    Other$1,429,990International$699,656Human Services$477,157Education$375,362Philanthropy$238,360Environment$57,442Youth Development$50,500Religion$20,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC: $699,656 over 9y, 71% of budgetEvery Kid Outreach Inc: $693,313 over 9y, 56% of budgetELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $477,157 over 9y, 24% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $375,362 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $335,761 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $129,890 over 8y, 12% of budget4ROOTS FOUNDATION INC: $108,470 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR INT'L REFORESTATION: $57,442 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE: $50,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHOUSAND HILLS MINISTRY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC ↗
    • Who funds Every Kid Outreach Inc ↗
    • Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
    • Who funds FLORIDA FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds 4ROOTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR INT'L REFORESTATION ↗
    • Who funds FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE ↗
    • Who funds THOUSAND HILLS MINISTRY INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 60%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glenda G Morgan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph