· Public charity
The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc
The organization is operated for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and to carry out the purposes of its supported organizations.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of THE GLENDA G MORGAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $276,009 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $293,945 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,936 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND | $65,700 |
| OTHER DOMESTIC PROJECTS | $65,432 |
| UCF FOUNDATION | $38,607 |
| ELEVATION SCHOLARS | $32,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC | $25,300 |
| EVERY KIDS OUTREACH | $25,000 |
| 4ROOTS | $13,470 |
| ELEVATE ORLANDO | $10,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $477k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ESELEVATION SCHOLARS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $477k · revenue +78%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +52%
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $336k · revenue +49%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help ensure the achievement of academic excellence and career opportunities for rural students in north east florida.
Help haitian agriculture initiatives become self-sustaining by providing financial & business assistance, thereby reducing poverty through long-term development.
The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of the university of florida. more specifically, the foundation is organized to…
Followers of Christ, Inc. is a Haitian-run nonprofit organization based in Florida serving the people of Haiti through Christian ministries and mission work.
Florida certified organic growers and consumers, inc. (fog) supports and promotes organic, regenerative, and sustainable agriculture.
To fight hunger through united forces/partnerships; provide nutritional food products that will nurture, sustain and enhance quality of life; facility, contribute and promote programs for hunger relief, strengthening our communities.
The fund was created because the florida legislature found there was a need to increase the availability of seed capital and early stage venture equity capital for emerging companies in the state, including, without limitation, enterprises…
ROOTS Africa is a non-profit venture whose mission is to combat hunger and poverty in Africa by connecting academic institutions and experts in the US to farming communities in Africa. We have a vision to connect the world by engaging…
Haitian Roots provides educational scholarships to disadvantaged children as well as providing for the needs of young orphans living in an urban orphanage. Haitian Roots is also continuously working towards building their own school on a…
The Florida FFA Association is a premier youth, leadership organization with over 65,000 middle and high school student members as part of over 300 local FFA chapters across the state. FFA members participate in nearly 50 leadership and…
EFI's mission is to cultivate agricultural discipleship worldwide for enhanced food security and livelihoods, envisioning a network of churches eradicating hunger and insecurity globally.
Secure florida's future's primary exempt purpose is to educate the citizens of florida about economic competitiveness and job growth opportunities to secure florida's future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Leadership Venture and the most unlike its peers is Thousand Hills Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Every Kid Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds 4ROOTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR INT'L REFORESTATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND HILLS MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Glenda G Morgan Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.