Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Giving World Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$181kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$15kHealth$4kAnimals$3kFood & Nutrition$1kCommunity Improvement$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WONDER MEDIA LLC$5,000
DIRECT RELIEF$2,500
GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$1,500
AUDUBON VERMONT$1,000
HOWARD CENTER$1,000
KING STREET CENTER$1,000
MAGICIANS WITHOUT BOARDERS$1,000
MANNA FOODBANK$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving61% of grant dollars ($165k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($105k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAGICIANS WITHOUT BOARDERS: $1k → 9%GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA: $15k → 10%MAGICIANS WITHOUT BOARDERS: $1k → 9%GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA: $11k → 10%MAGICIANS WITHOUT BOARDERS: $1k → 9%GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA: $9k → 10%GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA: $2k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 10%KING STREET CENTER: $1k → 10%KING STREET CENTER: $1k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 10%HOWARD CENTER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US39% of all-years giving ($105k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$105k · 5 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 37% of The Giving World Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Giving World Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 59% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$241k · 9 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$241k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+86%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue +72%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +39%
  • MW
    MAGICIANS WITHOUT BORDERS INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
  • TO
    TRUNKS OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - LOIS MCCLURE BEE TABAKIN HOPE LODGE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc

The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
3
Ymca of San Diego County

The ymca of san diego county is a nonprofit with a mission to nurture a healthy spirit, mind, and body so all can thrive while honoring our faith-based heritage.

Human Services
4
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
5
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
6
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
7
Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc

Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.

Health
8
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
9
Young Men's Christian Association of Central New Mexico

The mission of the ymca of central new mexico is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for over 100 years, the ymca of central new mexico has served our community…

10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
11
Meriden-New Britain-Berlin Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The meriden-new britain-berlin ymca seeks to become a 'master link' in our communities to enhance the quality of life for all people who live and work in meriden, new britain and berlin. the meriden-new britain-berlin ymca provides all…

Human Services
12
Bangor Young Men's Christian Association

The bangor region ymca is a community leader in supporting children, adults, and families in their lifelong quest for physical, emotional, and social wellness.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Burlington Ymca Inc and the most unlike its peers is King Street Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONCERN INDIA FOUNDATION — $105,343 · OtherCONCERN INDIA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $55,236 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWONDER MEDIA LLC — $15,000 · OtherWONDER MEDIA LLCIndividual grant recipient — $12,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRUNKS OF NEW YORK — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $5,500 · OtherGREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC — $36,500 · Human ServicesGREATER BURLINGTON…MAGICIANS WITHOUT BORDERS INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesMAGICIANS WITHOUT …SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM YOUTH AND…KING STREET CENTER INC — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $18,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $2,500 · InternationalMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $250 · Community Improvement
Other$203,969Human Services$45,000International$20,500Food & Nutrition$1,000Community Improvement$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC — $36,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAGICIANS WITHOUT BORDERS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKING STREET CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHowardCenter Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER BURLINGTON YMCA INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds MAGICIANS WITHOUT BORDERS INC
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds KING STREET CENTER INC
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds HowardCenter Inc
  • Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Kelsey Trust · Fanny Allen Corporation · The University of Vermont Medical Center · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · George W Mergens Foundation · The Argosy Foundation · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Giving World Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • King Street Center Inc43% of income from government
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc23% of income from government
  • HowardCenter Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Giving World Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Giving World Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph