Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gillespie Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$3.4MEnvironment$51kEducation$48kHealth$14kCommunity Improvement$8kAnimals$4kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$123,004
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POPULATION COMMUNICATION$123,004
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VENTURE STRATEGIES: $5k → 10%THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $3k → 10%THEODORE PAYNE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%MIDLAND SCHOOL: $2k → 14%KAUAI FOREST BIRDS RECOVERY PROJECT: $2k → 9%FUNDERS NETWORK: $4k → 10%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%POPULATION MEDIA CENTER: $2k → 10%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 23%VENTURE STRATEGIES FOR HEALTH DEVEL: $5k → 10%THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $3k → 10%THE HUNTINGTON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 14%PARTNERS IN POPULATION AND DEVELOPM: $22k → 17%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%NATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH: $3k → 14%VENTURE STRATEGIES FOR HEALTH DEVEL: $5k → 10%THE HUNTINGTON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 14%THE OASIS INITIATIVE: $5k → 10%LA COUNTY ARBORETUM: $3k → 14%POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU: $3k → 14%THE OASIS INITIATIVE: $5k → 10%THE HUNTINGTON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 14%WORLD BUSINESS ACADEMY: $5k → 14%LA COUNTY ARBORETUM: $2k → 14%WORLD BUSINESS ACADEMY: $2k → 14%THE HUNTINGTON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3k → 14%VENTURE STRATEGIES: $5k → 10%DKT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%VENTURE STRATEGIES: $5k → 10%LEARNING WORKS: $4k → 14%ARLINGTON GARDEN IN PASADENA: $2k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $1.5M → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $1.2M → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $125k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $123k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $110k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $100k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $100k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $72k → 14%POPULATION COMMUNICATION: $36k → 14%MISC UNDER 1000 PER DONEE: $11k → 14%MISC UNDER 1000 PER DONEE: $3k → 14%MISC UNDER 1000 PER DONEE: $3k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE URBAN WILDLANDS GROUP: $8k → 14%PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%FAMILY HEALTH ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
DC
HI
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 19 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
23

Total granted

$3.5M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+31%

Still filing today

53%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationInternationalHealthSocial ScienceAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    POPULATION COMMUNICATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +421% · 100% of their budget
  • VS
    VENTURE STRATEGIES FOR HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT DBA OASIS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +59%
  • AG
    Arlington Garden in Pasadena
    7× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +233%

Funded once

  • PI
    PARTNERS IN POPULATION AND DEVELOPM
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • TU
    THE URBAN WILDLANDS GROUP INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +8%
  • DI
    DKT INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Rescape California

ReScape addresses climate change by providing a regenerative, nature-based whole systems foundation for landscaping education, workforce development and policy.Foundational to our work is a whole systems watershed framework that…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trust for Public Land and the most unlike its peers is Urban Homestead Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr11%98%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,946

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

POPULATION COMMUNICATION — $3,381,870 · Social SciencePOPULATION COMMUNICATION+1 more — $2,500 · Social SciencePARTNERS IN POPULATION AND DEVELOPM — $21,619 · OtherMISC UNDER 1000 PER DONEE — $18,922 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherTHE HUNTINGTON BOTANICAL GARDENS — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $11,000 · OtherLEARNING WORKS — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,500 · OtherFUNDERS NETWORK — $4,000 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH — $4,000 · Other+11 more — $19,592 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION — $11,000 · EducationWORLD BUSINESS ACADEMY — $8,169 · EducationPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $5,996 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $5,750 · EducationMIDLAND SCHOOL CORPORATION — $5,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $4,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationArlington Garden in Pasadena — $9,105 · EnvironmentTHE URBAN WILDLANDS GROUP INC — $8,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $6,000 · EnvironmentTHEODORE PAYNE FOUNDATION FOR WILD FLOWERS AND NATIVE PLANTS INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentRARE — $1,057 · EnvironmentBLUEENERGY — $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $1,000 · EnvironmentVENTURE STRATEGIES FOR HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT DBA OASIS — $10,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc — $5,000 · HealthREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $1,000 · HealthDKT INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 · InternationalENGENDERHEALTH INC — $1,000 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 · InternationalJUST FOREIGN POLICY — $1,000 · InternationalPasadena Community Foundation — $3,500 · Philanthropy
Social Science$3,384,370Other$117,633Education$44,915Environment$28,162Health$16,000International$8,000Philanthropy$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOPULATION COMMUNICATION — $3,381,870 over 8y, 100% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURE STRATEGIES FOR HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT DBA OASIS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetArlington Garden in Pasadena — $9,105 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS ACADEMY — $8,169 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $5,996 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $5,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDKT INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND SCHOOL CORPORATION — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILLY HEALTH ALLIANCE — $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPopulation Reference Bureau Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE PLANET UNITED — $2,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetTHEODORE PAYNE FOUNDATION FOR WILD FLOWERS AND NATIVE PLANTS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPASADENA ART ALLIANCE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRARE — $1,057 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR LOS ANGELES WILDLIFE INC — $1,032 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Homestead Institute — $1,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetENGENDERHEALTH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST FOREIGN POLICY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan Thompson Bu…Pasadena Community Fo…EcoTrustCalifornia Community …The Annenberg Foundat…Silicon Valley Commun…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…
The Susan Thompson Buffett FoundationNE17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · EcoTrust · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gillespie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gillespie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gillespie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines