Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gifford Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$557k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$250k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

69% of The Gifford Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Gifford Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $557k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
2
’18
5
’19
5
’20
6
’21
5
’22
5
’23
2
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.2MRecreation & Sports$2.4MHuman Services$157kHealth$100kCrime & Legal$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kPublic Benefit$11kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $204k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$3,387
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC Berkeley$250,000
East Palo Alto Tennis Tutoring$204,000
University of Nevada Las Vegas$23,563
Indiana University of Pennsylvania$22,479
University of Utah$19,619
West Chester University$13,902
Individual grant recipient$7,720
Bucks County Community College$4,227
UCLA Foundation$3,387
Junipero Serra High School$2,880
Individual grant recipient$2,000
First Tee Silicon Valley$1,000
Youth on Course$1,000
Foundation Assisting Seniors$500
Silicon Valley Community Foundation$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Peninsula Family Service: $100 → 7%Freedom Service Dogs: $200 → 8%Foundation Assisting Seniors: $500 → 13%Hospice of the Valley: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NV
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
AZ
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 28 repeat orgs$423k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
22

Total granted

$3.9M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+38%

Still filing today

18%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2020 · $101k · revenue +62%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue +20%
  • NF
    NCGA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue +296%

Funded once

  • FS
    Firstmark Services
    one grant, 2021 · $151k
  • UD
    US Department of Education
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
3
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
4
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Computer History Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

East Palo Alto Tennis Tutoring: $1,078,000 · OtherEast Palo Alto Tennis TutoringUCLA: $816,671 · OtherUCLAUC Berkeley: $510,000 · OtherUC BerkeleyOne Mind: $309,999 · OtherOne MindFirstmark Services: $150,981 · Other+44 more: $1,133,953 · Other+44 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,455,511 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $540,100 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANF…University of San Francisco: $112,453 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $101,000 · Education+8 more: $78,321 · EducationSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $2,200 · PhilanthropyFuture Talent of Silicon Valley: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFoundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $200 · Human ServicesHospice of the Valley: $200 · Human ServicesPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $100 · Human ServicesMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $200 · HealthK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $200 · AnimalsCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,999,604Education$2,287,385Philanthropy$2,200Recreation & Sports$1,000Human Services$1,000Health$200Animals$200Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,455,511 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $540,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $112,453 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $101,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $36,452 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $18,755 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKER SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $2,014 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFuture Talent of Silicon Valley: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation Assisting Seniors Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAWAIHAE CANOE CLUB INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PARKER SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gifford Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gifford Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gifford’s filings →

More from the funding graph