Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ghh Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Youth Development$488kEducation$178kHuman Services$126kReligion$117kAnimals$45kPublic Benefit$43kRecreation & Sports$30kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
DICKSON COUNTY HELP CENTER$15,000
KINSMAN REDEEMER HOMELESS SHELTER$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISSION 615: $25k → 14%KINSMAN REDEEMER HOMELESS SHELTER: $10k → 11%KINSMAN REDEEMER HOMELESS SHELTER: $10k → 11%MISSION 615: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$380k · 7 repeat orgs$704k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$380k
$664k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+19%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GLASGOW BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    4× · 2021–2024 · $188k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $55k
  • P1
    PROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB CAVE CITY
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • GB
    GIRLS & BOYS CLUB OF APPALACHIA
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • BC
    BARREN COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jim King Ministries Inc

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
2
Kentucky Mountain Mission of Eastern Kentucky

The organization engages in evangelistic and discipleship ministries in rural churches in eastern kentucky.

Recreation & Sports
3
Kentucky Baptist Fellowship Inc

Our mission is to equip and empower kentucky baptist churches and christians, cultivate partnerships, and engage in missions.

4
Biblical Counseling and Training Ministries

To teach individuals how to apply the wisdom and depth of the bible's grace-centered message to the problems of daily living; and through various means, work to restore chirst to counseling and christ-centered counseling to the church.

5
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
6
Kingdom Global Ministries

Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.

Religion
7
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

8
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
9
Damon Thompson Ministries Inc

Advancing the kingdom of god and spreading the gospel through preaching, teaching, and evanelizing.

Religion
10
Kingdom Community Ministries

To bring people into a closer relation with jesus christ, and help them overcome the crippling effects of sin and guilt. we accomplish this mission by offering our counselees a christ-centered scripturally - rotted approach; wherein,…

Health
11
Kansas City College & Bible School Inc

Establish, conduct, operate and maintain a bible college, a high school, grade school and preschool under the doctrines and advocates of the church of god (holiness) for training in ministry, missions and christian workers in general.

Education
12
Kentucky Race Track Chaplaincy Inc

Kentucky Race Track ChaplaincyVision, Mission and ValuesVision Our vision is to bring about the salvation of all people in the horse racingthrough the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.Mission Our mission is to nurture the spiritual and…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pastors Discipleship Network and the most unlike its peers is Basic Training Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB CAVE CITY — $200,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB CAVE CITYGLASGOW BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $188,000 · OtherGLASGOW BOYS & GIRLS CLUBGIRLS & BOYS CLUB OF APPALACHIA — $100,000 · OtherGIRLS & BOYS CLUB OF APPALACHIAIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherGLASGOW HIGH SCHOOL+18 more — $196,500 · Other+18 moreBARREN COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationBARREN COU…Mission 615 Inc — $44,000 · Human ServicesKinsman Redeemer Homeless Ministry — $20,000 · Human ServicesPASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK — $50,000 · InternationalPROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION — $45,000 · AnimalsHILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES — $15,000 · Religion
Other$789,500Education$100,000Human Services$64,000International$50,000Animals$45,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Religion$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBARREN COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK — $50,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPROVERBS 1210 ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION — $45,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMission 615 Inc — $44,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH POLICY CENTER INC — $21,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKinsman Redeemer Homeless Ministry — $20,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetDICKSON COUNTY HELP CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE UNLIMITED FAMILY CARE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASIC TRAINING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CARE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ghh Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ghh Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ghh Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph