Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2026still arriving
32
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$245kPhilanthropy$127kHealth$44kHuman Services$39kAnimals$33kHousing & Shelter$25kArts & Culture$22kYouth Development$12kOther$0
02FY2026 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k31 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATION$35,000
RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$7,000
CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY$5,000
GRAFTON FOOD PANTRY$5,000
COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY OF RICHMONDSPRING GROVE$5,000
HEBRON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$5,000
HARVARD FOOD PANTRY$5,000
MORE CENTER FOOD PANTRY$5,000
NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF WONDER LAKE$5,000
CARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY$5,000
ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
WOODSTOCK FOOD PANTRY$5,000
TLS VETERANSVETERANES PATH TO HOPE$4,000
HOME OF THE SPARROW$2,000
GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $2k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $1k → 12%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $1k → 12%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%PIONEER CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $1k → 6%TURNING POINT: $5k → 6%TURNING POINT: $5k → 6%TURNING POINT: $5k → 6%TURNING POINT: $2k → 6%TURNING POINT: $2k → 6%TURNING POINT: $2k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 6%ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 41 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
4

Total granted

$702k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+33%

Still filing today

51%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Woodstock Food Pantry
    6× · 2021–2026 · $34k · revenue +690%
  • AI
    ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $29k · revenue +58%
  • GT
    Grafton Township Food Pantry
    6× · 2021–2026 · $29k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -40%
  • PO
    PUBLIC ORGANIZATION ANIMAL SHELTER SIRIUS
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hinsdale Humane Society

To prevent animal suffering and neglect throughout our community and beyond, and to ensure that all animals in shelters and homes are well cared for and treated with compassion.

Animals
2
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
3
Champaign County Humane Association

The champaign county humane association owns and operates the paws animal shelter. the mission is to provide food and shelter to abandoned and strayed animals.

Animals
4
Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc

Operation of Animal Shelter

Animals
5
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
6
Macoupin County Adopt a Pet

Rescue, care, and adoption services for pets

Animals
7
Humane Society of Monroe County Il

The organization rescues animals and cares for them until they can find them qualified homes.

Animals
8
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
9
Pet Network Humane Society

Pet Network rescues adoptable animals from euthanasia, connects abandoned animals with loving families, instills respect for animals through humane education, and enhances lives through animal companionship.

Animals
10
Animal Health Organization

To fill the needs of countless animals and their families by providing access to veterinary medical care, food, shelter, supplies, and other resources to keep animals happy, healthy, and out of shelters.

Animals
11
Hands N Paws Animal Assistance

The prevention of cruelty to animals and promotion of animal welfare through rescue, rehabilitation, and rehoming of abandoned or abused pets.

Animals
12
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Algonquin-Lake in the Hills Interfaith Food Pantry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Salt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATION: $161,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF MCC FOUNDATIONWoodstock Food Pantry: $34,000 · OtherWoodstock Food PantryHARVARD FOOD PANTRY: $29,000 · OtherHARVARD FOOD PANTRYMORE CENTER FOOD PANTRY: $29,000 · OtherMORE CENTER FOOD PANTRYCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY: $29,000 · OtherCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRYIndependence Health & Therapy: $18,000 · Other+22 more: $180,000 · Other+22 moreHebron Community Food Pantry: $29,000 · Food & NutritionHebron Commun…Grafton Township Food Pantry: $29,000 · Food & NutritionGrafton Towns…CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,000 · Food & NutritionCRYSTAL LAKE …ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesALGONQUIN-…Turning Point Inc: $21,000 · Human ServicesTurning Po…GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $10,000 · Human ServicesGOT YOUR S…Pioneer Center for Human Services: $9,000 · Human ServicesPioneer Ce…RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $29,000 · Arts & CultureASSISI ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · AnimalsHOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsFOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · AnimalsON ANGELS WINGS INC: $5,000 · AnimalsHOOF WOOF & MEOW ANIMAL RESCUE: $3,000 · AnimalsPROJECT HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · AnimalsSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsHome of the Sparrow Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC: $9,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$480,500Food & Nutrition$87,000Human Services$69,000Arts & Culture$29,000Animals$26,500Housing & Shelter$20,000Crime & Legal$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWoodstock Food Pantry: $34,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetHebron Community Food Pantry: $29,000 over 6y, 34% of budgetALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetGrafton Township Food Pantry: $29,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY: $29,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetCRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $29,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $21,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIndependence Health & Therapy: $18,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPioneer Center for Human Services: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPets for Vets Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASSISI ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetON ANGELS WINGS INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOOF WOOF & MEOW ANIMAL RESCUE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Woodstock Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds Hebron Community Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds ALGONQUIN-LAKE IN THE HILLS INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Grafton Township Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds CARY GROVE FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CRYSTAL LAKE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds RAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds Home of the Sparrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds Independence Health & Therapy ↗
  • Who funds GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS ↗
  • Who funds Pioneer Center for Human Services ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF MCHENRY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Pets for Vets Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASSISI ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY HELPING PAWS ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ON ANGELS WINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for McHenry CountyIL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for McHenry County · Aptargroup Charitable Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · AbbVie Foundation · Full Circle Foundation · Foglia Family Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bersted Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Baxter International Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gerhard & Patricia Weiler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph