· Private foundation
The George B Storer Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $424k
- $50k–250k26 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+1 grant · $341k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH AMERICAN ASSOC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION | $341,000 |
| NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION | $225,000 |
| BETTER WYOMING | $220,000 |
| RMI | $200,000 |
| WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK | $200,000 |
| THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP | $175,000 |
| ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| EQUALITY STATE POLICY CENTER | $100,000 |
| ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS | $100,000 |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS | $85,000 |
| OUTDOOR ALLIANCE | $80,000 |
| WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL | $80,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 9% of The George B Storer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in WY; by stated purpose, 34%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.
50 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NANORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCA7× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +77%
- TRTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +93%
- BWBETTER WYOMING5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +18% · 70% of their budget
Funded once
- AUANTIOCH UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLANDone grant, 2017 · $204k
- WOWE OWN ITone grant, 2017 · $200k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $160k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.
Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
Building leaders to protect the west's land, air, and water.
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
How this is measured
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCA ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER WYOMING ↗
- Who funds TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY STATE POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Outdoor Alliance ↗
- Who funds WYOFILE ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds FORWARD WYOMING ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Pathways ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds WYOMING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Wilderness Society · Marin Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · Patagoniaorg · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Knobloch Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Park Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The George B Storer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George B Storer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Vermont Outdoor Business Alliance Inc: 100% of income from government
- Willamette Partnership: 76% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The George B Storer Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The George B Storer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on George B Storer’s filings →